| 书目名称 | Can Theories be Refuted? | | 副标题 | Essays on the Duhem- | | 编辑 | Sandra G. Harding | | 视频video | | | 丛书名称 | Synthese Library | | 图书封面 |  | | 描述 | According to a view assumed by many scientists and philosophers of science and standardly found in science textbooks, it is controlled ex perience which provides the basis for distinguishing between acceptable and unacceptable theories in science: acceptable theories are those which can pass empirical tests. It has often been thought that a certain sort of test is particularly significant: ‘crucial experiments‘ provide supporting empiri cal evidence for one theory while providing conclusive evidence against another. However, in 1906 Pierre Duhem argued that the falsification of a theory is necessarily ambiguous and therefore that there are no crucial experiments; one can never be sure that it is a given theory rather than auxiliary or background hypotheses which experiment has falsified. w. V. Quine has concurred in this judgment, arguing that "our statements about the external world face the tribunal of sense experience not indi vidually but only as a corporate body". Some philosophers have thought that the Duhem-Quine thesis gra tuitously raises perplexities. Others see it as doubly significant; these philosophers think that it provides a base for criticism of the foundationa | | 出版日期 | Book 1976 | | 关键词 | falsification; physical theory; science; scientific discovery | | 版次 | 1 | | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0 | | isbn_softcover | 978-90-277-0630-0 | | isbn_ebook | 978-94-010-1863-0Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292 | | issn_series | 0166-6991 | | copyright | D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1976 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
发表于 2025-3-21 18:26:48
