Titlebook: Belief and Practice in Imperial Japan and Colonial Korea; Emily Anderson Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Tr

DNR215

,Developing an Imperial Theology: Transforming “Others” into “Brothers in Christ” for a Multiethnic iculated imperial justifications for evangelism at the turn of the twentieth century. While viewed with suspicion as internal “others” for their allegiance to an ostensibly foreign religion, Japanese Protestants were nonetheless crucial participants in the debates that attempted to give intellectual

多山

泄露

judicial

,Poch’ŏn’gyo and the Imperial State: Negotiations Between the Spiritual and Secular Governments,me the emperor of Korea. The Japanese imperial authorities therefore deemed this group to be politically dangerous and began to repress it, firstly by trying to capture Ch’a and arresting many members, then by outlawing it as a quasi-religion, and latterly by engaging in a “war” of attrition and dis

萤火虫

Exposure

环形

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10343-1formation of religion relates to Japan’s empire remains, however, relatively obscure. Historians increasingly apply the historiographic approach of “new imperial history” to Japan’s modern empire, spatially and chronologically prioritizing the colonial periphery in relation to the imperial metropole

落叶剂

他一致

Kreditversicherung und politische Risikene late nineteenth century. This work has shown that it is conceptually untenable to continue to employ an exclusively binary framework of nationalism versus collaboration to analyze Korean Buddhist responses to the Japanese colonial state. Japanese colonialism raised a particular set of problems due

Uncultured