找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: A Primer to Causal Reasoning About a Complex World; Lars-Göran Johansson,Thomas Banitz,Maja Schlüter Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2024 The Editor(s) (if a

[复制链接]
楼主: retort
发表于 2025-3-26 21:24:01 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-02523-8age learnt in childhood. The way to give their meaning is to display a number of contexts in which causal expressions are used without any justification. The chapter ends with a presentation and discussion of Hume’s criteria for the use of the term ‘cause’. The main points are:
发表于 2025-3-27 04:20:23 | 显示全部楼层
Grundgesetz und sozialer Wandel,cience we are mostly interested in generalities, so the focus is usually how to infer causal relations between types of events/states of affairs and between variables..The main points in this chapter are:
发表于 2025-3-27 05:46:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 13:28:06 | 显示全部楼层
Causal Relations and Causal Relata in Sciencecience we are mostly interested in generalities, so the focus is usually how to infer causal relations between types of events/states of affairs and between variables..The main points in this chapter are:
发表于 2025-3-27 14:44:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 19:12:19 | 显示全部楼层
Causation in Social-Ecological Systems Researcheasoning from a broader angle, to illustrate the diversity of ways in which sustainability researchers reason about causation, and to highlight the many instances within a research process in which researchers engage in causal reasoning.
发表于 2025-3-27 22:06:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 02:29:07 | 显示全部楼层
Direkte Demokratie in der Strategie der SED, corresponding counterfactual. An account of causation in terms of the more restricted concept of potential outcomes is much more useful. It is closer to empirical practice and is more reliable. The main points are:
发表于 2025-3-28 06:53:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 14:20:08 | 显示全部楼层
Causation, Counterfactual Dependence and Potential Outcomes corresponding counterfactual. An account of causation in terms of the more restricted concept of potential outcomes is much more useful. It is closer to empirical practice and is more reliable. The main points are:
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-7 17:54
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表