找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Austrian Philosophy Past and Present; Essays in Honor of R Keith Lehrer,Johann Christian Marek Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Do

[复制链接]
楼主: Forbidding
发表于 2025-3-27 00:27:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 01:23:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 08:00:47 | 显示全部楼层
,Haller and Brentano’s Empiricism,Haller claims that Brentano is an empiricist Brentano is close to Comte’s positivism and to the Vienna circle in emphasizing the methods of natural science as appropriate for philosophy. He also underscores the importance of experience as a starting point of analysis. All this seems convincing.
发表于 2025-3-27 10:09:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 14:16:55 | 显示全部楼层
Inductive Knowledge,A plea for an inductivist theory of knowledge is presumably not quite in tune with the fashion of the day. Nevertheless, contrary to the currently prevailing opinion that the case for induction is closed and beyond any hope, my claim is that induction is the only hope left if we want to avoid skepticism.
发表于 2025-3-27 19:59:28 | 显示全部楼层
An Autobiographical Outline,The historical background of my schooldays was the last period of the Austrian Nazi regime and those years when Austria no longer existed after it had become part of the German Reich. I was sent to school in Graz after the war and took my final exams in 1947/48 at a night school.
发表于 2025-3-28 01:28:35 | 显示全部楼层
The Motion of Geostationary Satellite,omponent of what separates Austrian philosophy from German philosophy. German philosophy tries to build grand (but ultimately substandard) metaphysical edifices; Austrian philosophy tries (without evident success) to demolish them.
发表于 2025-3-28 05:24:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 08:36:40 | 显示全部楼层
Metaphysics: De-Stroyed or In-De(Con)structible,omponent of what separates Austrian philosophy from German philosophy. German philosophy tries to build grand (but ultimately substandard) metaphysical edifices; Austrian philosophy tries (without evident success) to demolish them.
发表于 2025-3-28 12:05:35 | 显示全部楼层
Analyticity, Carnap, Quine, and Truth,ruth against the type of argument he himself advanced in “Two Dogmas” against Carnap’s notion of analyticity. If he wants to keep his argument, Quine has to discard truth along with analyticity. At the end of the paper I suggest an interpretation of Quine on which he can be seen as having done just that.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-18 14:13
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表