Titlebook: Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation; Thomas Bustamante,Christian Dahlman Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switz

Hayes

书目名称Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation网络公开度




书目名称Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation被引频次




书目名称Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation被引频次学科排名




书目名称Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation年度引用




书目名称Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation年度引用学科排名




书目名称Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation读者反馈




书目名称Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation读者反馈学科排名

Instantaneous

Intercept

negligence

Introvert

Institutional Constraints of Topical Strategic Maneuvering in Legal Argumentation. The Case of ‘Insusts itself in . and . In analyzing strategic maneuvering one category of parameters to be considered are the constraints of the institutional context. In this paper I explore the institutional constraints for topical selection for the legal argumentative activity type .. I will make a distinction be

细胞膜

One-Sided Argumentation in the Defense of Marriage Actd reinforced by . briefs supporting those appeals. Specifically, I describe the role of . briefs commonly used in appellate argumentation in the United States. Then I identify six characteristics of these arguments: clarifying a legal principle, emphasizing amici interests, refuting oppositions’ arg

吸引人的花招

Anti-Theoretical Claims About Legal Interpretation: The Argument Behind the Fallacythat lawyers should adopt while interpreting statutes and other legal materials. Some of these theorists hold that theory and philosophy have nothing to offer jurists and play a very limited role in the justification of a legal decision. I call this thesis the “Anti-Theoretical Claim”. This claim ap

勾引

Frames of Interpretations and the Container-Retrieval View: Reflections on a Theoretical Contestions of legal interpretation and general written-law norms. The paper describes and compares two theories: the frames of interpretations theory and the container-retrieval theory (in its conventional linguistic meaning variety). By means of a critical survey, the frames of interpretations theory wil

大看台

Argument Structures in Legal Interpretation: Balancing and Thresholdstatements, generation of arguments that support or demote the interpretive statements, and comparison and balancing of arguments supporting incompatible interpretive statements. The focus of the paper is on the third layer. A case study is presented to demonstrate how a court uses a technique referr

mediocrity