找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation; Thomas Bustamante,Christian Dahlman Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switz

[复制链接]
楼主: Hayes
发表于 2025-3-25 05:16:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 10:37:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 15:43:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 18:27:15 | 显示全部楼层
Experimental Hematology Today 1979tatements, generation of arguments that support or demote the interpretive statements, and comparison and balancing of arguments supporting incompatible interpretive statements. The focus of the paper is on the third layer. A case study is presented to demonstrate how a court uses a technique referr
发表于 2025-3-25 23:40:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 00:33:33 | 显示全部楼层
Ger van den Engh,Jan Visser,Barbara Trasknorm for judges in the application of law implies that they take into account a combination of different considerations of a normative and factual nature with the aim of reconciling the requirements of abstract formal justice and justice and fairness in the concrete case. Although reasonableness is
发表于 2025-3-26 06:09:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 11:15:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 12:58:20 | 显示全部楼层
978-3-319-35487-3Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
发表于 2025-3-26 19:19:34 | 显示全部楼层
Anti-Theoretical Claims About Legal Interpretation: The Argument Behind the Fallacyhe strong version contains a performative contradiction, for it contains an implicit theoretical position about legal interpretation, the weak variant cannot be grounded without a moral argument to defend the value of incompletely theorized agreements, which is missing in the reasoning of its suppor
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-7 10:20
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表