找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Anyone Who Has a View; Theoretical Contribu Frans H. Eemeren,J. Anthony Blair,A. Francisca Sno Book 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Do

[复制链接]
查看: 22249|回复: 62
发表于 2025-3-21 16:33:20 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Anyone Who Has a View
期刊简称Theoretical Contribu
影响因子2023Frans H. Eemeren,J. Anthony Blair,A. Francisca Sno
视频video
学科分类Argumentation Library
图书封面Titlebook: Anyone Who Has a View; Theoretical Contribu Frans H. Eemeren,J. Anthony Blair,A. Francisca Sno Book 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Do
影响因子This volume of the Argumentation Library contains a collection of twenty-six theor­ etical contributions to the study of argumentation. Together they provide an over­ view of recent developments in the theory of argumentation which does justice to the theoretical variety in the field. InAnyone Who Has a View, the subject of argu­ mentation is approached from different angles. Both the formal and informal logical approaches and the rhetorical and communicative approaches arc represented in various ways. We arc convinced that the collection of essays as a whole will be of interest not only to those engaged directly in the study of argumentation, but also to scholars from a variety of disciplines who arc interested in the recent developments in this field. The book opens with an essay by the informal logician Robert C. Pinto. For all the differences between them, James B. Freeman, Harvey Siegel, Ralph H. Johnson, Hans V. Hansen, and J. Anthony Blair are also prominent members of that move­ ment. Some informal logicians either eschew or simply do not use formal methods in their approach to argumentation, while others, such as David Hitchcock, use both formal and informal methods. Erik
Pindex Book 2003
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Anyone Who Has a View影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Anyone Who Has a View影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Anyone Who Has a View网络公开度




书目名称Anyone Who Has a View网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Anyone Who Has a View被引频次




书目名称Anyone Who Has a View被引频次学科排名




书目名称Anyone Who Has a View年度引用




书目名称Anyone Who Has a View年度引用学科排名




书目名称Anyone Who Has a View读者反馈




书目名称Anyone Who Has a View读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:11:28 | 显示全部楼层
,Toulmin’s Warrants, about it. And I respond to criticisms of the concept by (.), (.) and (.). Their criticisms show the need for some revision of Toulmin’s position, but his basic concept of warrant, I shall argue, should be retained as a central concept for the evaluation of arguments.
发表于 2025-3-22 00:57:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:33:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:35:53 | 显示全部楼层
Relationships Among Logic, Dialectic and Rhetoric,ive years or so, a flurry of activity has raised the profile of these questions in this community, particularly with the focus on how dialectic and rhetoric and their relationships bear on the identification, interpretation and assessment of arguments and argumentation (see the special issues of . edited by ., and by .).
发表于 2025-3-22 16:56:13 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38418-0 a metadialogue relative to the first dialogue. It will be about this first dialogue and perhaps some related dialogues. Also, its primary purpose is to help this first dialogue achieve its end: in this sense the metadialogue will be embedded in the ground level dialogue.
发表于 2025-3-22 20:20:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:17:26 | 显示全部楼层
Problemstellung, Zielformulierung,insuperable difficulties. They propose, instead, that rationality be understood in terms of judgment rather than (or in addition to) rules. Govier criticizes some of my previous work on the subject for being overly committed to the classical model, and for equivocating on ‘judgment.’
发表于 2025-3-23 04:16:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:23:49 | 显示全部楼层
Rationality and Judgment,insuperable difficulties. They propose, instead, that rationality be understood in terms of judgment rather than (or in addition to) rules. Govier criticizes some of my previous work on the subject for being overly committed to the classical model, and for equivocating on ‘judgment.’
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-11 09:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表