Titlebook: Anyone Who Has a View; Theoretical Contribu Frans H. Eemeren,J. Anthony Blair,A. Francisca Sno Book 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Do

过时

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-99033-4 what is ordinarily considered the legal domain involves recourse to reasoning.. Legal scientists put forward interpretive statements: they propose what they see as reasonable interpretations of laws and defend these interpretations with arguments. Both of these tasks require reasoning. Lawyers, whe

首创精神

,Zähler für besondere Verwendungszwecke,ddress that topic when I responded to the paper he presented at the conference on Argumentation and Rhetoric sponsored by the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) in May, 1997 (.; .). In that paper Johnson discussed some differences he perceived in the approaches of logic and rhetor

CRP743

,Zähler für besondere Verwendungszwecke,f himself, than his alleged discovery of a new type or mode of logical reasoning commonly referred to as abduction. In a retrospective note written in 1902 Peirce in this respect even declared himself “an explorer upon untrodden ground.” (CP 2.102). Whether or not this boasting judgment was indeed j