找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Views on Fuzzy Sets and Systems from Different Perspectives; Philosophy and Logic Rudolf Seising Book 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelber

[复制链接]
楼主: VEER
发表于 2025-3-30 10:58:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 15:48:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 20:00:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 23:25:05 | 显示全部楼层
Fuzzy Preferences as a Convenient Tool in Group Decision Making and a Remedy for Voting Paradoxes,s and make models more realistic. Then, we will briefly present some tools to be used, notably how to deal with linguistically quantified statements, and with a linguistic quantifier driven aggregation.
发表于 2025-3-31 04:36:34 | 显示全部楼层
What We Are Learning from Neurosciences about Decision-Making: A Quest for Fuzzy Set Technology,ox and Poldrack, 2005) suggested that people do not evaluate options by their objective value but rather by their utility and conjectured that appropriate choices are those for which the expected utility is maximum. Bernoulli also argued that utility functions should to be a concave function because
发表于 2025-3-31 07:55:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 12:44:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 14:34:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 20:41:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-4-1 00:42:16 | 显示全部楼层
Fuzzy Logic and Science,guous criteria, trying below in such a note to illuminate as editors potential authors of . journal with . their decisions. Should we think then that scientists can take advantage of some kind of “fuzzy logic”, in order to evaluate the quality of a scientific paper, but such a logic can not be part of such a scientific paper?
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-4 10:54
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表