找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments; First IFIP TC 2/WG 2 Bertrand Meyer,Jim Woodcock Book 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelbe

[复制链接]
查看: 34515|回复: 64
发表于 2025-3-21 18:10:53 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments
副标题First IFIP TC 2/WG 2
编辑Bertrand Meyer,Jim Woodcock
视频video
丛书名称Lecture Notes in Computer Science
图书封面Titlebook: Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments; First IFIP TC 2/WG 2 Bertrand Meyer,Jim Woodcock Book 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelbe
描述A Step Towards Verified Software Worries about the reliability of software are as old as software itself; techniques for allaying these worries predate even James King’s 1969 thesis on “A program verifier. ” What gives the whole topic a new urgency is the conjunction of three phenomena: the blitz-like spread of software-rich systems to control ever more facets of our world and our lives; our growing impatience with deficiencies; and the development—proceeding more slowly, alas, than the other two trends—of techniques to ensure and verify software quality. In 2002 Tony Hoare, one of the most distinguished contributors to these advances over the past four decades, came to the conclusion that piecemeal efforts are no longer sufficient and proposed a “Grand Challenge” intended to achieve, over 15 years, the production of a verifying compiler: a tool that while processing programs would also guarantee their adherence to specified properties of correctness, robustness, safety, security and other desirable properties. As Hoare sees it, this endeavor is not a mere research project, as might normally be carried out by one team or a small consortium of teams, but a momentous endeavor, compar
出版日期Book 2008
关键词C#; algorithms; concurrent systems; dependability; distributed systems; exception handling; fault toleranc
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69149-5
isbn_softcover978-3-540-69147-1
isbn_ebook978-3-540-69149-5Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349
issn_series 0302-9743
copyrightSpringer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments网络公开度




书目名称Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments被引频次




书目名称Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments被引频次学科排名




书目名称Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments年度引用




书目名称Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments年度引用学科排名




书目名称Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments读者反馈




书目名称Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:47:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:17:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:41:07 | 显示全部楼层
Methods and Tools for Formal Software Engineeringems with research at TRDDC in modelling and development of tools that support object-oriented and component-based design. The main theme is an integration of verification techniques with engineering methods of modelling and design, and an integration of verification tools and transformation tools. T
发表于 2025-3-22 09:35:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:58:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:20:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:29:38 | 显示全部楼层
Some Interdisciplinary Observations about Getting the “Right” Specification focus on specific properties such as avoiding the dereferencing of null pointers; the latter is more likely to address the question of whether the steps of design satisfy some overall specification. I not only prefer the latter but I have also argued that this is the main way to get formal methods
发表于 2025-3-23 05:09:31 | 显示全部楼层
Software Verification and Software Engineering a Practitioner’s Perspective-free..According to the Scope and Objectives.In the end, the conference should work towards the achievement of the long-standing challenge of the Verifying Compiler..I want to question whether this long-standing challenge is really relevant to the greater goal of achieving trustworthy software. Inst
发表于 2025-3-23 07:22:18 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-3 04:03
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表