找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Unequal Partners; American Foundations Fabrice Jaumont Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Foundation.Africa.Hig

[复制链接]
楼主: 果园
发表于 2025-3-23 12:56:04 | 显示全部楼层
The Discourse on Priorities Among Donorsnd resource dependency. Foundations need legitimacy for durability and sustainability, and this legitimacy is achieved through capacity building. As this chapter shows, the members of the PHEA had very different approaches to grantmaking, but were able to justify and legitimate their continued colla
发表于 2025-3-23 17:42:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 18:12:39 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion: Equal Participation and the Challenges of Higher Education Philanthropy several trend-setting foundations in the field of higher education in Africa: the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Ford Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, and the
发表于 2025-3-24 01:05:32 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2016trengthen capacity in higher education in Sub-Saharan African universities. The book examines the conditions under which philanthropy can be effective, the impasses that foundations often face, and the novel context in which philanthropy operates today. This study therefore assesses the shifting gro
发表于 2025-3-24 03:07:49 | 显示全部楼层
Century-Old Philanthropic Interests in Africa’s Higher Educational framework for the rest of the book. While providing the necessary historical context, this chapter stresses the continued relevance of these concepts in the debates surrounding present-day philanthropy.
发表于 2025-3-24 07:23:20 | 显示全部楼层
Educational Philanthropists and Higher Education Developers academic networks were partners of choice for US foundations. However, foundations also showed a preference for partners located in Anglophone over Francophone, Lusophone, or Arabic-speaking countries, indicating a linguistic bias in the grantmaking process.
发表于 2025-3-24 12:04:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 17:08:57 | 显示全部楼层
When Foundations Work Togethernefited to some degree from pooling the knowledge, strategies, and resources of its members, the foundations were reluctant to hand over their authority to a central decision-making body and often pursued their own grantmaking strategies and priorities independently.
发表于 2025-3-24 22:33:16 | 显示全部楼层
The Authority of Foundation Presidentsfoundation presidents can be a powerful voice in setting development priorities, this can be a problem in terms of program ownership as changes in leadership can have a detrimental effect on grantmaking institutions.
发表于 2025-3-25 02:44:24 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-19 08:28
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表