Titlebook: Understanding International Relations; Chris Brown Textbook 1997Latest edition Macmillan Publishers Limited 1997 Governance.hegemony.inter

notification

Definitions and Perspectives: Theory and Practiceions’ (lower case) — the use of upper and lower case in this way has become conventional and will be employed throughout this book — but what are ‘international relations’? A survey of the field suggests that a number of different definitions are employed. For some, international relations means the

哄骗

Theory and International Relations I: Past Debatesough the term itself was not coined until the end of the eighteenth century (Bentham 1789/1960: 426). The academic study of International Relations, on the other hand, hardly existed before the First World War. In the second half of the nineteenth century when the social sciences as we know them tod

eardrum

新奇

The State and Foreign Policy policy, power, security, conflict and war. This is the ‘realist’ agenda in the sense that these are the topics identified by realism and neorealism as the important topics for the study of international relations, but, of course, there is no reason to be limited to saying realist things about this

确认

Power and Securitym a structural perspective, states attempt to adapt to their environment, making the best of the cards the system has dealt them. Either way, states act in the world. How? What is the nature of diplomacy or ‘statecraft’ — a slightly old-world term that has recently been given a new lease of life? Th

packet

The Balance of Power and Wary, possibly desiring to dominate others, states are obliged to keep a watchful eye open for ways of enhancing their own power, and reducing that of others. Unrestrained and unprotected by any international government, states must look after their own security, even though they cannot but be aware th

TRUST

极大的痛苦

International Political Economyl’ politics. When the volume of transactions that crossed state boundaries grew ever larger in the 1960s and 1970s, a subsidiary distinction became common, that between ‘high politics’ — the traditional interstate agenda of war and peace — and ‘low politics’ — the projection of essentially domestic

Thymus

道学气