找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Unamuno‘s Religious Fictionalism; Alberto Oya Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Spring

[复制链接]
楼主: 赎罪
发表于 2025-3-25 05:45:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 11:09:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 11:43:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 19:30:06 | 显示全部楼层
,Unamuno on Spinoza’s ,: The “,”,. The aim of this chapter is to show that by affirming this “.”, Unamuno is not making the psychological, empirically contingent claim that we, human beings, desire for an endless existence, but the stronger, metaphysical claim that the most basic and natural inclination (or ., if we are to use Spin
发表于 2025-3-25 20:14:26 | 显示全部楼层
Reason and Experience Against Our Natural Longing for an Endless Existence,ied on an evidential, rational basis to form the belief that such longing of ours will be satisfied. A crucial point in Unamuno’s reasoning here is his claim that the kind of immortality we all naturally and primarily long for consists in our endless, continuing existence as the “.” (“men of flesh a
发表于 2025-3-26 01:29:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 05:50:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 09:23:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 16:19:33 | 显示全部楼层
,Unamuno’s Epistemological Paradigm,ject, the direction of fit, goes from the subject to the world. It is this epistemological paradigm Unamuno is relying on that allows us to understand why his reasoning takes the form of an argument from common consent, and why his notion of religious faith, despite involving a religious understandi
发表于 2025-3-26 19:17:45 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-19 07:27
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表