| 书目名称 | The Speculum Astronomiae and Its Enigma | | 副标题 | Astrology, Theology | | 编辑 | Paola Zambelli | | 视频video | | | 丛书名称 | Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science | | 图书封面 |  | | 描述 | The attribution of the .Speculum Astronomiae. to AlbertusMagnus became a controversial issue only recently, when the greatneo-Thomist historian Pierre Mandonnet suggested -- without anyantecedents -- that the author was Roger Bacon rather than Albert.Mandonnet‘s theses were refuted by Lynn Thorndike and have since thenbeen the subject of widespread discussion. .The present historiographical case-study considers this debate in thelight of an analysis of texts by Albert himself, as well as otherimportant authors, such as Bacon, Bonaventura, Thomas Aquinas, Witelo,Campanus of Novara, and others, which shows how widespread the generalconcept of the influence of the stars and other astrological ideas tobe found in the .Speculum. were. Most of the scientific ideas ofthe Middle Ages were based on principles derived from the notion ofcelestial influence and its consequences. The .Speculum. drew thefundamental outlines of this discipline into a theoretical andbibliographical introduction -- no small achievement -- and wasconsequently greeted with great interest and used as a standardreference book for many centuries. Set against the background ofdiscussions taking place in the 1260s, within | | 出版日期 | Book 1992 | | 关键词 | Middle Ages; Thomas Aquinas; astronomy | | 版次 | 1 | | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3467-7 | | isbn_softcover | 978-90-481-4098-5 | | isbn_ebook | 978-94-017-3467-7Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942 | | issn_series | 0068-0346 | | copyright | Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1992 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
发表于 2025-3-21 16:10:19
