找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: The Design Productivity Debate; Alex H. B. Duffy Conference proceedings 1998 Springer-Verlag London Limited 1998 architecture.design.desig

[复制链接]
查看: 21307|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 17:21:46 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称The Design Productivity Debate
编辑Alex H. B. Duffy
视频video
概述Providing an insight into the current understanding of design productivity Presents approaches such as concurrent engineering and team working, along with relevant case studies Edited by the Director
图书封面Titlebook: The Design Productivity Debate;  Alex H. B. Duffy Conference proceedings 1998 Springer-Verlag London Limited 1998 architecture.design.desig
描述Over the past decade, with greater emphasis being placed upon shorter lead times, better quality products, reduced product costs, and greater customer satisfaction, the topic of Engineering Design has received increased interest from the industrial and ac ademic communities. Considerable effort has been directed at developing design process methodologies and building computer tools that focus upon relatively narrow aspects of design, but many key problems in Engineering Design research and practice remain unanswered. Resulting from the First International Engineering Design Debate held in Glasgow, UK in late 1996, this volume discusses the main issues concerning the improvement of design productivity. Covering design studies, design development, concurrent engineering and design knowledge and information, it attempts to derive a common understanding of the basic factors, problems and potential solutions involved.
出版日期Conference proceedings 1998
关键词architecture; design; design process; development; engineering design; management; product development
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1538-0
isbn_softcover978-1-4471-1540-3
isbn_ebook978-1-4471-1538-0
copyrightSpringer-Verlag London Limited 1998
The information of publication is updating

书目名称The Design Productivity Debate影响因子(影响力)




书目名称The Design Productivity Debate影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称The Design Productivity Debate网络公开度




书目名称The Design Productivity Debate网络公开度学科排名




书目名称The Design Productivity Debate被引频次




书目名称The Design Productivity Debate被引频次学科排名




书目名称The Design Productivity Debate年度引用




书目名称The Design Productivity Debate年度引用学科排名




书目名称The Design Productivity Debate读者反馈




书目名称The Design Productivity Debate读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:46:51 | 显示全部楼层
第107361主题贴--第2楼 (沙发)
发表于 2025-3-22 02:59:00 | 显示全部楼层
板凳
发表于 2025-3-22 08:26:26 | 显示全部楼层
第4楼
发表于 2025-3-22 10:09:55 | 显示全部楼层
5楼
发表于 2025-3-22 13:35:21 | 显示全部楼层
6楼
发表于 2025-3-22 17:27:47 | 显示全部楼层
7楼
发表于 2025-3-22 21:59:35 | 显示全部楼层
8楼
发表于 2025-3-23 04:12:56 | 显示全部楼层
9楼
发表于 2025-3-23 06:59:07 | 显示全部楼层
10楼
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-14 17:20
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表