找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty; 15th European Confer Gabriele Kern-Isberner,Zoran Ognjanović Conference

[复制链接]
楼主: LH941
发表于 2025-3-30 11:14:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 13:01:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 17:31:10 | 显示全部楼层
Belief Functions and Degrees of Non-conflictnessdle that, degrees of non-conflictness and full non-conflictness are defined. The family of these degrees of non-conflictness is analyzed, including its relation to full non-conflictness. Further, mutual non-conflictness between two belief functions accepting internal conflicts of individual belief f
发表于 2025-3-30 22:50:51 | 显示全部楼层
On Expected Utility Under Ambiguitytive parameter from the unit interval with the semantics: the higher the aversion, the higher the coefficient. On three examples, we illustrate the approach is consistent with the experimental results observed by Ellsberg and other authors.
发表于 2025-3-31 02:28:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 05:40:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 11:35:30 | 显示全部楼层
On the Antecedent Normal Form of Conditional Knowledge Basesequivalences. In this paper, we propose the notion of antecedentwise equivalence of knowledge bases. It identifies more knowledge bases as being equivalent and allows for a simpler and more compact normal form than previous proposals. We develop a set of transformation rules mapping every knowledge
发表于 2025-3-31 17:17:24 | 显示全部楼层
Revisiting Conditional Preferences: From Defaults to Graphical Representations. is more plausible than . .”, which is a standard way of understanding the default rule “if . then generally .”. A set of such defaults translates into a set of constraints that can be represented in the setting of possibility theory. The application of a minimum specificity principle, natural when
发表于 2025-3-31 17:31:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-4-1 01:45:22 | 显示全部楼层
Interpretability of Gradual Semantics in Abstract Argumentationcs which satisfies this property can also be computed by aggregating the impact of the other arguments on it. This result allows to provide, for each argument in an argumentation framework, a ranking between arguments from the most to the least impacting ones w.r.t. a given gradual semantics.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-20 13:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表