找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Supervenience and Normativity; Bartosz Brożek,Antonino Rotolo,Jerzy Stelmach Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Edmund Hu

[复制链接]
查看: 11425|回复: 45
发表于 2025-3-21 18:12:36 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Supervenience and Normativity
编辑Bartosz Brożek,Antonino Rotolo,Jerzy Stelmach
视频video
概述Contains groundbreaking contributions to one of the most heated philosophical debates.Represents an attempt to bring together several contributions to the ongoing debate pertaining to supervenience of
丛书名称Law and Philosophy Library
图书封面Titlebook: Supervenience and Normativity;  Bartosz Brożek,Antonino Rotolo,Jerzy Stelmach Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Edmund Hu
描述.The present collection represents an attempt to bring together several contributions to the ongoing debate pertaining to supervenience of the normative in law and morals and strives to be the first work that addresses the topic comprehensively. It addresses the controversies surrounding the idea of normative supervenience and the philosophical conceptions they generated, deserve a recapitulation, as well as a new impulse for further development..Recently, there has been renewed interest in the concepts of normativity and supervenience. The research on normativity – a term introduced to the philosophical jargon by Edmund Husserl almost one hundred years ago – gained impetus in the 1990s through the works of such philosophers as Robert Audi, Christine Korsgaard, Robert Brandom, Paul Boghossian or Joseph Raz. The problem of the nature and sources of normativity has been investigated not only in morals and in relation to language, but also in other domains, e.g. in law or in the c.ontext of the theories of rationality. Supervenience, understood as a special kind of relation between properties and weaker than entailment, has become analytic philosophers’ favorite formal tool since 1980
出版日期Book 2017
关键词Edmund Husserl; Robert Audi; Supervenience; Christine Korsgaard; Robert Brandom; Paul Boghossian; Nature o
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61046-7
isbn_softcover978-3-319-86990-2
isbn_ebook978-3-319-61046-7Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG 2017
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Supervenience and Normativity影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Supervenience and Normativity影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Supervenience and Normativity网络公开度




书目名称Supervenience and Normativity网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Supervenience and Normativity被引频次




书目名称Supervenience and Normativity被引频次学科排名




书目名称Supervenience and Normativity年度引用




书目名称Supervenience and Normativity年度引用学科排名




书目名称Supervenience and Normativity读者反馈




书目名称Supervenience and Normativity读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:52:07 | 显示全部楼层
Propositional and Doxastic Justification: Their Relationship and a Questionable Supervenience Claimically justified to believe it. By contrast, doxastic justification is justification of beliefs, i.e., of doxastic states actually instantiated by an agent. The ‘orthodox’ view of the relationship between propositional and doxastic justification is that the latter should be explained in terms of the
发表于 2025-3-22 02:23:02 | 显示全部楼层
Moral Properties: Some Epistemological, Ontological, and Normative Dimensions,thority—or even their existence—when we seek to understand them philosophically. Some philosophers would say that even this open-ended contrast between respect and skeptical doubt presupposes too much: ontological neutrality requires speaking not of moral properties but instead of moral . Nonetheles
发表于 2025-3-22 07:32:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:37:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:42:54 | 显示全部楼层
The Supervenience Dilemma Explained Away,ological claim about the nature of normative properties that is incoherent with their defining agenda, or they recognize that their agenda is based on a queer ontology, which is at risk of being unintelligible. In a recent defense of robust moral realism, David Enoch recognizes that this is a seriou
发表于 2025-3-22 18:56:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:55:52 | 显示全部楼层
The Metaphysics of Law: From Supervenience to Rational Justification, which involves the condition of rational determination. It is argued that rational determination ought to be extended to all metaphysical grounding, for otherwise general metaphysical grounding would easily deteriorate to supervenience, which has already been rejected as a plausible basis of the gr
发表于 2025-3-23 05:05:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:29:24 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-21 09:01
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表