Titlebook: Sudden Deaths in Custody; Darrell L. Ross,Theodore C. Chan Book 2006 Humana Press 2006 chemical substance.delirium.physiological response.

皱纹

书目名称Sudden Deaths in Custody影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Sudden Deaths in Custody影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Sudden Deaths in Custody网络公开度




书目名称Sudden Deaths in Custody网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Sudden Deaths in Custody被引频次




书目名称Sudden Deaths in Custody被引频次学科排名




书目名称Sudden Deaths in Custody年度引用




书目名称Sudden Deaths in Custody年度引用学科排名




书目名称Sudden Deaths in Custody读者反馈




书目名称Sudden Deaths in Custody读者反馈学科排名

instructive

SENT

Book 2006magnitude of the problem clearly reveals that the subject matter is worthy of further consideration. Although the frequency of these deaths is very low, the criticality of its occurrence requires attention to the subject matter. The purpose of Sudden Deaths in Custody is to provide current informati

积习已深

Case Analysis of Restraint Deaths in Law Enforcement and Corrections,y impaired patient. Although sudden in-custody death is rare in occurrence, the incident comprises a myriad of potential contributing factors that can make determining a cause of death problematic. Numerous questions of what contributed to the sudden death arise. These include the following:

admission

Administrative Implications,rative personnel in police and correctional agencies, who can direct their line officers in how to best respond to these encounters, should address these factors. In order to place their agencies in the best position to defend against a litigation claim associated with a sudden incustody death, administrators should also address these issues.

调味品

The Nature of Sudden In-Custody Deaths,ter, is an unexpected event that can create a significant impact on the criminal justice system, the community at large, and the medical community. For a number of years, police, correction, and psychiatric entities have undergone sharp public, medical, and legal scrutiny regarding the type and degr

全部

Medical Overview of Sudden In-Custody Deaths,pected. Estimates regarding the exact numbers of custody deaths vary, but roughly occur at a rate of 0.1 per 100,000 of the total population of citizens in a given community (.). When these deaths are studied, well over half that occur in custody are attributable to natural causes (.–.). These natur

杠杆

Neck Holds,ed extensively by law enforcement personnel for physically restraining and gaining control of violent subjects. Choke holds and carotid sleeper holds are types of neck holds that have been employed by law enforcement. Neck holds utilize the mechanism of temporarily disrupting the blood flow to the b

CAND

Positional and Restraint Asphyxia,e, the more violent, combative, or uncooperative an individual, the greater and greater degrees of force required to restrain such persons. When an individual dies under such circumstances, it becomes a legitimate question whether the restraint process or specific method itself had any causal relati

河潭

Restraint Stress,question to answer. When an in-custody restraint death occurs, there is a close physical and temporal association between the restraint process and the death that follows. Because of this, it is tempting to attribute the cause of death to the restraint procedure itself. However, this is an error of