Titlebook: Struggling for Leadership: Antwerp-Rotterdam Port Competition between 1870 –2000; Reginald Loyen,Erik Buyst,Greta Devos Conference proceed

Firefly

deactivate

The Antwerp port: elements of spatial planning was the unrivalled centre of international trade. Due to religious wars, the Scheldt and thereby the city’s access to the sea, was blocked in 1585. It would take until the nineteenth century before the river was reopened to shipping again. From that moment on the expansion of the port and its activ

Glucose

Port and politics in Antwerp: a prudent approachThere was considerable influence of national and international politics on the development of this port. Trade and port are the point where foreign and domestic politics meet. Consequently the development of trade policy and of the ports is fraught with controversy between nations, between the affec

数量

The end of the seacility that is - under certain conditions - open for all potential (port)users on a non-discriminatory basis, at least for their own citizens. With the social goal to optimise the possibilities offered by unrestricted connections with the “outside world”, not jeopardized by the self interest of indi

王得到

Temporal-Lobe

Port of Rotterdam: land-use policy during the twentieth centuryand to commercial firms specialising in the mechanized (sometimes even automated) handling of bulk goods. The selection of firms was connected with the way in which the port was organized and exploited. The main argument of this paper will be that there was a close causal link between the management

令人苦恼

Commentary on the papers of Devos and de Goeypting, given the comparative focus of this volume, to dwell on the similarities and differences which emerge. Indeed in working out what I was going to say about the papers, I began with two columns headed ANTWERP and ROTTERDAM and noted down similarities and differences along a time line. This prov

lipoatrophy

Evolution of the Rotterdam port authority’s positiont the seaports of Rotterdam and Antwerp have reacted differently to more or less the same international economic developments and chances. To what extent this assumption can be justified is however the main theme and question of the volume itself. Before going into detail on the specific Rotterdam p