找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Structural Analysis of Non-Classical Logics; The Proceedings of t Syraya Chin-Mu Yang,Duen-Min Deng,Hanti Lin Conference proceedings 2016 S

[复制链接]
楼主: lumbar-puncture
发表于 2025-3-28 16:15:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 20:26:21 | 显示全部楼层
,Structural Models for Williamson’s Modal Epistemology,the cotenability problem and the gap problem. As I diagnose it, these problems somehow indicate that our standard way of understanding counterfactuals under the received possible-worlds semantics may have insufficient ‘structures’ to distinguish various different kinds of constraints on our counterf
发表于 2025-3-29 00:21:53 | 显示全部楼层
Motivating the Causal Modeling Semantics of Counterfactuals, or, Why We Should Favor the Causal Mod Stalnaker [.]. In this paper, I argue that, from the perspective of philosophical semantics, the causal modeling semantics proposed by Pearl [.] and others (e.g., Briggs [.]) is more plausible than the Lewis-Stalnaker possible-worlds semantics. I offer two reasons. First, the possible-worlds semant
发表于 2025-3-29 04:02:42 | 显示全部楼层
The Meaning of Epistemic Modality and the Absence of Truth, ‘the keys might be in the drawer’ and ‘they might be in the car’ (Kamp, Proc Aristotelian Soc N S 74:57–74 (1973), [.]). Namely, ‘or’ behaves like a conjunction ‘and’ when it meets epistemic modality ‘might’. It has been noted that it is very difficult to explain this phenomenon in terms of convers
发表于 2025-3-29 08:20:43 | 显示全部楼层
Revising a Labelled Sequent Calculus for Public Announcement Logic,g an axiom of Hilbert-style axiomatization of PAL. Then, we provide our revised calculus . to show that all the formulas provable in Hilbert-style axiomatization of PAL are also provable in . together with the . rule. We also establish that our calculus enjoys cut elimination theorem. Moreover, we s
发表于 2025-3-29 14:49:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 17:09:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 20:41:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 01:13:02 | 显示全部楼层
Constructive Embedding from Extensions of Logics of Strict Implication into Modal Logics,al logics via labelled sequent calculi. Then, they regard a monotonicity of atomic propositions in intuitionistic logic as an initial sequent, i.e., an axiom. However, we regard the monotonicity as an additional inference rule and employ a modified translation sending an atomic variable . to . to ge
发表于 2025-3-30 04:45:03 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-26 08:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表