Titlebook: Speaking of Apes; A Critical Anthology Thomas A. Sebeok,Jean Umiker-Sebeok Book 1980 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1980 Syntax.c

compose

Horizon

countenance

Communication and Language in the Home-Raised Chimpanzee,unctioning but the child is mentally retarded, he may be able to hear but not to imitate. Again, he does not learn to speak. A normal ear, a normal brain and speech organs, the continuous hearing of spoken language, and a great deal of imitation are necessary for the completion of the process.

钉牢

A Word Between Us,nduly by the introduction of formalization and by creating an aura of philosophy about language that is—they claim—unnecessary and merely serves to becloud the straightforward and “simple” facts. R. A. and B. T. Gardner, for instance, state (1969):

偏见

树木中

Language in Child and Chimp?, to the language development of children. With increasing frequency, widely ready journals such as Science publish reports of the transmutation of base primates into noble ones. It is no wonder there is a growing belief among students and scientists alike that modern behavioral science has in fact succeeded in teaching human language to apes.

做作

浮夸

What Might be Learned From Studying Language in the Chimpanzee? The Importance of Symbolizing Oneseens, or the lexigrams of a computer console in a manner that parallels the human use of single symbols. Most provocative have been demonstrations that chimpanzees can use sequences of symbols. This suggests a syntactic potential as well as a symbolic one.

生命层

Is Problem-Solving Language?,er vocabularies than were thought possible following the unsuccessful attempts of the Hayeses (1951), the Kelloggs [1933 (1967); this volume], and others to communicate with chimpanzees via vocal languages. What is at issue is whether a chimpanzee can master relationships between words—in particular, relationships as expressed in sentences.

GRAIN

; von Neumann entropy is a measurement on the domain of quantum states..These results yield a foundation from which one can (a) reason qualitatively about probability, (b) derive the lattices of Birkhoff and von Neumann in a unified manner, suggesting that domains may provide a formalism for the log