Titlebook: Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar; Acts of the Ninth Eu Stephen Read Book 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993 15th cen

船员

Book 1993hagen, Nijmegen, Rome, Oxford, Poitiers and Freiburg­ am-Breisgau. The ninth Symposium was held in St Andrews in June 1990, with 57 participants who listened to addresses by 28 speakers. It was very fitting that Scotland‘s oldest university, founded in the heyday of medievalleaming in 1411, should h

单调女

FIR

Ferrybridge’s Logica: A Handbook for solving Sophismatattempt to “solve” sophisms (i.e. to determine their truth value) should be founded. Moreover, a connection between his work and sophisms is established by the author himself: for, quoting a truth definition for propositions later on disproved, he explicitly describes its aim as “to prove sophisms an

chiropractor

Boethius de Dacia et al. The sophismata in MSS Bruges SB 509 and Florence Med.-Laur. S. Croce 12 sined about the same time (in the early fourteenth century, it would seem), but probably in widely different places, . perhaps in Belgium or Britain, . in Italy (judging by styles of writing). The two manuscripts contain partly identical collections of . from the late thirteenth century. The collection

圆柱

The ‘Sophismata’ attributed to Marsilius of Paduaitical philosophers of the later Middle Ages. The heated discussions the . provoked also had the effect, however, of putting other works of his in almost perennial shade. This is the case, for example, with other political treatises such as . which, in spite of its intrinsic relevance, survived in o

Middle-Ear

DRAFT

坦白

A Comparative Analysis of the Treatment of Sophisms in MSS Digby 2 and Royal 12 of the Magister Abst Bibliothèque Nationale, 14069; Oxford, Corpus Christi 293B; Oxford, Bodleian Library, Digby 2; and British Museum, Royal Fxix 12), only Digby 24 and Bruges 497 appear to be complete, each containing an “explicit” identifying the author as a certain Ricardus Sophista. Of the four fragmentary manuscr

延期

initiate

Expositio as a method of solving sophisms there seems to be almost nothing common to all of them. Secondly, modern discussion of these texts is still somewhat scattered. The texts simply are not yet known well enough for finding unifying perspectives.