Titlebook: Sociology through Relation; Theoretical Assessme Christian Papilloud Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 French

不服从

书目名称Sociology through Relation影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Sociology through Relation影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Sociology through Relation网络公开度




书目名称Sociology through Relation网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Sociology through Relation被引频次




书目名称Sociology through Relation被引频次学科排名




书目名称Sociology through Relation年度引用




书目名称Sociology through Relation年度引用学科排名




书目名称Sociology through Relation读者反馈




书目名称Sociology through Relation读者反馈学科排名

实现

refraction

Contact: Gaston Richard and Marcel Mauss on Sacrifice and Magic,ough relation: contact. Contact is the concrete element describing how the actors give to their objects and to their activities a relational orientation, which leads to the mobilisation of other actors, objects and activities.

挑剔小责

Position: Marcel Mauss and Pierre Bourdieu on Gift, Interest, and the Mobilisation of Actors, social structures. But they did not agree on the relation. Bourdieu’s relation is a given fact which freezes equal actors in rivalry. Mauss’ relation is a cycle embedding various activities which contribute to changing the social positions of actors within social hierarchies.

obstinate

Book 2018 debate in the French tradition about the purpose of a relational perspective in sociology and the social sciences. Christian Papilloud analyzes the cardinal steps of this debate, which historically relate to the concept of solidarity, expressing an ideal of social cohesion through relationships bet

Dorsal-Kyphosis

,Solidarity: Émile Durkheim, Gaston Richard and Social Cohesion,tion. At each of these levels, the similarities and the differences between both authors are stressed. Durkheim and Richard link solidarity to the question of social cohesion. But if Durkheim understands solidarity as the condition of social order, Richard understands it as the condition of a resistance against society.

Pituitary-Gland

Conclusion: The Prospect of a Sociological Theory Through Relation,tion. These various propositions regarding the key assessments of the relational sociologists, as discussed in the introductory first chapter, are compared. The conclusion on the status of such a perspective in sociology is that it can be seen as a general purpose theory dealing with pervasive societal phenomena.

背信

compassion

,Solidarity: Émile Durkheim, Gaston Richard and Social Cohesion,y. The comparisons deepen at each thematic level the authors use in order to reflect upon solidarity—corporations, professions, cooperation and obligation. At each of these levels, the similarities and the differences between both authors are stressed. Durkheim and Richard link solidarity to the que

NEG

Contact: Gaston Richard and Marcel Mauss on Sacrifice and Magic,his writings on sacrifice and magic. Chapter 3 compares both Richard and Mauss on the themes related to their conception of resistance, especially penalty, pain, and inhibition. This comparison enables us to highlight a first important dimension for a theoretical framework adapted to a sociology thr