Titlebook: Sociologies of New Zealand; Charles Crothers Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 History of Sociology.Sociology

CHAFE

Charles CrothersPresents the first book-length study of the history sociology in New Zealand.Employs keen content analysis of the publications of New Zealand as well as historical, qualitative, bibliometrical and sur

TATE

改良

Sociologies of New Zealand978-3-319-73867-3Series ISSN 2947-5023 Series E-ISSN 2947-5031

皮萨

Forsake

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73867-3History of Sociology; Sociology of Sociology; New Zealand; sociology of knowledge; history of the social

歌曲

A Long Prehistory: Up to 1960,iest studies were either high-level or completely empiricist and statistical, but gradually theoretically developed projects appeared with empirical support, including fieldwork, as the research infrastructure developed to provide more extensive opportunities. Several ‘pre-sociology’ projects were iconic for the later development of sociology.

disparage

Sociology Interest Areas and Adjacent Disciplines,ionship within and to mainstream ‘Sociology’ sketched. Most remain rather latent subject areas where teaching is carried out at separate sites, while a few have developed active networks of scholarship and research.

障碍物

The Production of New Zealand Sociology,ternational sociologies are discussed. The expected asymmetrical pattern is found, but some reverse cultural traffic is also documented. The various forms of output from NZ sociology are documented, encompassing a substantial but variegated output across books, journal articles, and other formats.

案发地点

Conclusion,f sociologists active in particular periods are shown to have had major impacts on NZ sociology as it has developed. The argument is developed at three levels: the rise and fall of departments, of specialties, and of active research networks and the ways in which external and internal factors have shaped these.

Perineum

tion, continues to provide the most coherent framework for an understanding of the socioeconomic and political development of the first workers’ state since the October Revolution. His problematic of the ‘bureaucratically degenerated workers’ state’ is complemented by the insights developed by Preob