找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?; Michael Ruse Book 1979 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1979 sociobiology

[复制链接]
查看: 22425|回复: 42
发表于 2025-3-21 17:09:29 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?
编辑Michael Ruse
视频video
丛书名称Critical Issues in Psychiatry
图书封面Titlebook: Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?;  Michael Ruse Book 1979 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1979 sociobiology
描述In June 1975, the distinguished Harvard entomologist Edward O. Wilson published a truly huge book entitled, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. In this book, drawing on both fact and theory, Wilson tried to present a com­ prehensive overview of the rapidly growing subject of ‘sociobiology‘, the study of the biological nature and foundations of animal behaviour, more precisely animal social behaviour. Although, as the title rather implies, Wilson was more surveying and synthesising than developing new material, he com­ pensated by giving the most thorough and inclusive treatment possible, beginning in the animal world with the most simple of forms, and progressing via insects, lower invertebrates, mammals and primates, right up to and in­ cluding our own species, Homo sapiens. Initial reaction to the book was very favourable, but before the year was out it came under withering attack from a group of radical scientists in the Boston area, who styled themselves ‘The Science for the People Sociobiology Study Group‘. Criticism, of course, is what every academic gets (and needs!); but, for two reasons, this attack was particularly unpleasant. First, not only were Wilson‘s ideas attacked, bu
出版日期Book 1979
关键词sociobiology
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9389-1
isbn_softcover978-94-009-9391-4
isbn_ebook978-94-009-9389-1
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1979
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?网络公开度




书目名称Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?被引频次




书目名称Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?被引频次学科排名




书目名称Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?年度引用




书目名称Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?年度引用学科排名




书目名称Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?读者反馈




书目名称Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:11:23 | 显示全部楼层
The Biological Background,viously, I do not want to introduce the whole of biology, but rather those aspects which have some bearing on sociobiology. Therefore, the guiding thread at this point will be the nature of sociobiology and the way in which it is supposed to relate to the rest of biology. Possibly, some readers inte
发表于 2025-3-22 03:46:23 | 显示全部楼层
The Sociobiology of Animals,in turn the subjects of aggression, sexuality, parenthood, and altruism. Although this will not exhaust the sociobiological ., it will be fully representative. Inevitably, there will be some overlap, because the topics chosen are by no means fully separate.
发表于 2025-3-22 06:18:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:28:02 | 显示全部楼层
Normative Criticisms,ambridge-based Sociobiology Study Group of Science for the People. (Allen .., 1976, 1977.) However, we know also that, since the initial outbursts, more temperate critics have appeared, particularly — of all people — the anthropologist Marshall Sahlins (1976). No doubt, nothing stirs one to action q
发表于 2025-3-22 16:06:18 | 显示全部楼层
Epistemological Criticisms,riticisms of a rather different kind: criticisms which purportedly show that sociobiology is a pseudo-science because it has various conceptual or methodological defects, either internal to the subject itself or as it relates to external reality. As before, when once a criticism has been introduced,
发表于 2025-3-22 20:48:26 | 显示全部楼层
The Positive Evidence,. When asked why anyone should accept his theory of evolution through natural selection, he used to reply that there were three reasons. First, there was what we might call the . evidence from the struggle for existence and the undoubted variation in the wild. Second, there was the . evidence, from
发表于 2025-3-22 21:15:10 | 显示全部楼层
Sociobiology and the Social Sciences,iobiology frozen at some point in time (the present!) and trying to evaluate its worth. In this chapter, I want to consider matters from a ‘dynamic’ viewpoint: that is to say, I want to see how things could develop through time, from the present to the future. In particular, assuming that human soci
发表于 2025-3-23 02:32:45 | 显示全部楼层
Sociobiology and Ethics,rounded on evolutionary theorizing. One thinks here specifically of Charles Darwin’s contemporary, Herbert Spencer, who more than anyone drew tight bonds between evolution and ethics; although, given Spencer’s present reputation, whilst philosophers think of Spencer as primarily a biologist, no doub
发表于 2025-3-23 06:45:37 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-24 01:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表