Titlebook: Socialism in Russia; Lenin and His Legacy John Gooding Book 2002 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license t

发怨言

我吃花盘旋

,The Vision, 1890–1917,me before his Marxism, and was almost certainly begun by his brother’s execution. His first guru in the field of revolution was not Marx but the writer his brother had admired most, Nikolai Chernyshevsky, whose belief in a distinctive Russian path to socialism had gone together with fierce hostility

猛击

,The Realization, 1917–24,it of Napoleon — ‘..’ It was a Marxist leap of course, yet a Marxist leap of a very peculiar kind; and in another remarkable admission Lenin would concede that the Bolsheviks had ‘started from the opposite end to that prescribed by theory’.. The western path to socialism by way of capitalism and bou

podiatrist

,After Lenin, 1924–9, an era would nevertheless be an understatement. Lenin had founded, shaped and guided the Bolshevik party, had played a decisive part in the creation and development of the Soviet state, and had made a vast contribution to the content, style and implementation of Soviet policy. Had he lived on, he m

Ruptured-Disk

继而发生

,Onward to Communism, 1953–64,ievement socialism; he had entrenched a highly privileged ruling class with unlimited authority, under himself, to carry out whatever policies he deemed necessary. Yet communism remained remote. To many foreign observers at least, it seemed that the socialist project in Russia had gone wildly and pe

employor

,A Problem of Credibility, 1964–85,e would be no return to personal rule; there would also be no rash policies which might damage or discredit the party. Government would be genuinely collective, and the top jobs were accordingly divided — Alexei Kosygin became premier and Leonid Brezhnev took the more important position of party Fir

accessory

礼节

,A New Socialism, 1985–91,rvious to change, that its rulers would ward off any attempt at serious reform.. When perestroika began, therefore, most experts reacted with extreme scepticism — ‘Don’t be deceived!’ was the characteristic response.. The changes would be no more than cosmetic; real change under the Soviet regime wa

水獭