找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Social Values and Social Indicators; Essays in Normative S. Subramanian Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under e

[复制链接]
楼主: MASS
发表于 2025-3-27 00:47:12 | 显示全部楼层
Revisiting the Normalization Axiom in Poverty Measurementto a variant of Sen’s index, together with a variant also of the Foster–Greer–Thorbecke poverty measures, is advanced and discussed. The derivation of the new normalization axiom benefits from Basu’s decomposition of the Sen axiom.
发表于 2025-3-27 02:40:36 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,il of Social Science Research. As the title suggests, the book deals with certain normative aspects of economics, as reflected in the manner in which social choices and the axiomatic bases of economic measurement are restricted by moral values and the demands of logical consistency. This motivation
发表于 2025-3-27 06:39:52 | 显示全部楼层
‘Instrumentalism’ and Friedman’s Methodology: A Short Objection or otherwise of the assumptions underlying a theory. In this view, what is important for an economist engaged in formulating policy is to have a theory which is capable of generating accurate predictions. This note asserts, with the help of a very simple example, that theories based on unrealistic
发表于 2025-3-27 09:29:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 14:41:35 | 显示全部楼层
Liberty, Equality, and Impossibility: Some General Results in the Space of ‘Soft’ Preferenceslly formulated vague preferences. With sufficiently weakened versions of the liberty and equity principles, one can secure an existence result in a ‘relation-functional’ setting. However, difficulties tend to re-appear in a ‘choice-functional’ setting, when one subscribes to the notion that while pr
发表于 2025-3-27 20:15:32 | 显示全部楼层
The Arrow Paradox with Fuzzy Preferencesy Theorem is then examined within the resulting framework of vague individual and social preferences. The outcome of this exercise is compared with some earlier results available in the literature on the Arrow paradox with fuzzy preferences.
发表于 2025-3-27 23:14:29 | 显示全部楼层
Equality, Priority, and Distributional Judgementsn providing a brief critique of Parfit’s arguments, the essay draws on the author’s own earlier work and that of Thomas Christiano and Will Braynen, John Broome, and Marc Fleurbaey. It considers issues relating to the ‘Levelling Down Objection’, the ‘Divided World example’, and the distinction betwe
发表于 2025-3-28 05:08:12 | 显示全部楼层
Two Logical and Normative Issues Relating to Measurement in the Social Sciencest in his or her engagement with the project of measurement. It deals, in particular, with two often overlooked issues with which quantification in the social sciences should be concerned: (1) social indicators in relation to the contrast between outcomes and processes; and (2) measurement which tend
发表于 2025-3-28 08:41:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 13:09:22 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-29 19:02
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表