Titlebook: Sir James Frazer And The Literary Imagination; Essays In Affinity A Robert Fraser Book 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Pub

可扩大

书目名称Sir James Frazer And The Literary Imagination影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Sir James Frazer And The Literary Imagination影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Sir James Frazer And The Literary Imagination网络公开度




书目名称Sir James Frazer And The Literary Imagination网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Sir James Frazer And The Literary Imagination被引频次




书目名称Sir James Frazer And The Literary Imagination被引频次学科排名




书目名称Sir James Frazer And The Literary Imagination年度引用




书目名称Sir James Frazer And The Literary Imagination年度引用学科排名




书目名称Sir James Frazer And The Literary Imagination读者反馈




书目名称Sir James Frazer And The Literary Imagination读者反馈学科排名

四指套

Frazer and Scottish Romanticism: Scott, Stevenson and ,en’s story whose origins lie in an earlier (1909) French reading-book. . clearly contains a picture of the Frazer household and of the author of .. He features as Monsieur Troisel, the holiday-hating biblioholic who spends dinner time showing to his wife “the proof-sheets of his pogonological treati

准则

The Birth of Humility: Frazer and Victorian Mythography,d meaning of myth and the relation of myth to ritual at any one moment during the quarter-century represented by the writing of . is impossible because of the theoretical confusion that obtains on this question in his work”.. The subject of mythology provoked the same kind of impassioned uncertainty

Bumble

Crayon

粘土

颂扬本人

,“Carnivals of Mass-Murder”: The Frazerian Origins of Wyndham Lewis’s , is first encountered. Many years ago it was my good fortune to be spellbound by a repeat of D. G. Bridson’s radio dramatisation for the BBC Third Programme (1951, 1955). Subsequently coming to read the trilogy (1955–6), I must confess that, while I remained gripped by its often sublime sequels . an

CAGE

,“A Healed Whole Man”: Frazer, Lawrence and Blood-Consciousness,n as early as 1911.. What we can say more confidently is that Lawrence’s initial interest in Frazer was part of a broader interest in his part in anthropological and “occult” studies, and that this interest predated the First World War I but was intensified by the war itself.. We know, of course, th

磨坊

担忧

,“For Gods are Kittle Cattle”: Frazer and John Buchan,e Himmelfarb’s more accurate comments on Buchan in an otherwise very misleading article,. and it is interesting to see that, even at this early date — the novelist was only twenty-five — a preoccupation with popular myth had already made itself apparent.