Titlebook: Shock Wave Lithotripsy; State of the Art James E. Lingeman (Director of Research),Daniel M. Book 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New Y

剧毒

BULLY

Advances in Management of Staghorn Calculiients with staghorn calculi are reported. Residual fragments remained in 35% of patients treated with ESWL monotherapy, 14% of patients treated with combination therapy, and 11% of patients treated with percutaneous techniques alone. The need for blood transfusions correlated with the invasiveness o

充满装饰

彩色

A Simple Guideline for Treating Staghorn Stones kidneys. Percutaneous debulking was satisfactory in about 70% of cases. In the remaining 30% of cases (mostly non-dilated kidneys), debulking provided poor results. The overall complication rate is quite low, and most of the common complications can be prevented. Percutaneous procedures in non-dila

思想流动

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Staghorn and Large Calculiameter) were treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) between April 1, 1986, and October 30, 1987. Fracturization occurred in 98.4% of cases. There was only one patient whose staghorn calculi (composed of cystine) could not be fracturized. Twenty-seven cases (57.4%) required preoperat

生来

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and ESWL versus Ureteral Stent and ESWL for the Treatment of Large Renable-J stent prior to treatment. A prospective, randomized study was designed to clarify if ESWL plus ureteral stenting is preferable to the combination of PNL/ESWL for the treatment of large renal calculi (> 2.5 cm) and staghorn stones. To date 74 patients have entered the study; preliminary data of

milligram

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Past, Present, and FutureBetween 1980 and 1983, approximately 1,200 patients were treated on the HM. and HM. lithotripters,. culminating in the development of the HM. lithotripter. There are now more than 250 of these machines distributed in 28 countries.

DOTE

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Ureteral Stones in the Upper, Mid, and Lower Ureter little difference in the success rate between . treatment and treatment after retrograde displacement. The treatment of ureteral calculi with ESWL compares favorably with other treatment options and offers the advantage of being less invasive.