Titlebook: Shelley; R. B. Woodings Textbook 1968Latest edition Macmillan Publishers Limited 1968 Britain.history of literature.literature.nineteenth

MIRE

The Case of Shelley (1952),eant to qualify: Shelley, he is saying, was a very able craftsman, but he chose to write about the wrong things. Matthew Arnold and Leslie Stephen disagreed about the nature of Wordsworth’s virtues, but they were essentially in agreement as to the nature of Shelley’s defects. Those defects, they sai

Vsd168

myopia

,Shelley’s ‘Air-prism’: The Synesthetic Scheme of , (1958),xpression is particularly elusive because it is developed in connection with an unusual symbolic device, which I shall somewhat desperately call the ‘air-prism’. With this device of the air-prism, Shelley brings together in a sort of ideal union the coloring of the rainbow and the music of the Aeoli

CRATE

Apraxia

Potentiality in , (1963),ination of Ezekiel and Milton throws some light on how these passages came to be written, the fact remains that the tone of these visions differs widely from biblical prophecy and the vengeful deity of Milton’s chariot. Nothing in Shelley is more characteristic than these visions, and nothing in She

花争吵

HERTZ

The Evening Star: ,he stereotype of a superlatively gentle, sensitive, and rather fragile Keats which had very little to do with the sturdy, courageous, and stoical little poet who had died in Rome. The Adonis legend was of course equally effective in modifying Shelley’s story away from historical actuality. Having ch

ALE

BALK

In Defence of Shelley (1963), to work a beneficial change in opinion or institution, is poetry.’. It is obvious that such an approach to poetry presupposes the negation and condemnation of the ‘self-centred seclusion’. into which the poet might be tempted to withdraw because of his inability or unwillingness to come to terms wi

他姓手中拿着

Shelley and the Mutinous Flesh,culations on love warrant any such over-simplified distinction as his apologists have made for him. An examination of one of Shelley’s own statements on the matter suggests that the love poetry may be more honestly and more meaningfully interpreted than it has been in the past.