找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Seventeenth-Century Indivisibles Revisited; Vincent Jullien Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 epistemology.indi

[复制链接]
楼主: Malevolent
发表于 2025-3-27 00:01:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 03:27:28 | 显示全部楼层
,Cavalieri’s Indivisibles,here he met Benedetto Castelli, lecturer in Mathematics at the University. He arrived in Pisa, completely lacking in mathematical preparation. Cavalieri went to Florence and remained in this town for more than 1 year (1617–1618) until he was asked to come back to Pisa to substitute for Castelli in h
发表于 2025-3-27 08:17:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 12:54:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 17:12:29 | 显示全部楼层
,Could or Should Gregory of Saint-Vincent Use Cavalieri’s Indivisibles to Present His Own Quadratureess of in-laws in a family. But this corresponds to an analogous situation in the prehistory of Calculus concerning the historiography on the “Geometry by indivisibles”. A part of Calculus is indeed manifested in Gregory of Saint-Vincent’s works by an old curve leading to two new functions, the loga
发表于 2025-3-27 18:51:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 00:29:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 03:29:14 | 显示全部楼层
Two Jesuits Against the Indivisibles,what different on the subject which interests us: while Father Antoine de Lalouvère (1600–1664) was firmly hostile to indivisibles, Father André Tacquet (1612–1160) accepted their use, but under serious restrictive conditions meant to prevent the risks of paralogisms. The question of knowing whether
发表于 2025-3-28 06:28:43 | 显示全部楼层
,The Role of Indivisibles in Mengoli’s Quadratures,nd ultimately succeeded him in the chair of mechanics. He graduated in philosophy in 1650 and 3 years later in canon and civil law. In his first period, he wrote three mathematical books, . (Bologna, 1650), . (Bologna, 1655) and . (Bologna, 1659). He took holy orders in 1660 and was prior at the chu
发表于 2025-3-28 14:19:18 | 显示全部楼层
Wallis on Indivisibles,(Wallis 1656). Next we will revise Wallis’s views on indivisibles as articulated in his answer to Hobbes’s criticism in the early 1670s. Finally, we will turn to his discussion of the proper way to understand the angle of contingence in the first half of the 1680s. As we shall see, there are marked
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-9 02:22
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表