Titlebook: Self-defense in Islamic and International Law; Assessing Al-Qaeda a Niaz A. Shah Book 2008 Niaz A. Shah 2008 international law.law.politics

检查

Introduction approach. and undemocratic means (Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine). “The rules of the game are changing” (Blair, August 5, 2005, see Mary Robinson cited in Lord Steyn, 2006). Terrorism is not only a challenge to international peace and security (Security Council Res. 1368, 2001; General Assembly, reso

古老

Self-defense in Islamic Law-Muslims about the meaning and spirit of Koranic Jihad. The scholarship on Jihad reflects that it is not only laypersons that are confused or misinformed. Scholars of Islam, both in Western and Islamic worlds, also do not agree on a single interpretation of Jihad. Therefore, there are different and

商业上

Anticlimax

毛细血管

Legality of Iraq Invasionure that those who support the invasion of Iraq are either on the payroll of Anglo-American administrations or politically aligned with them. The great majority of independent international lawyers view, as the rest of this chapter shows, the invasion as illegal.

一大块

Lice692

http://image.papertrans.cn/s/image/864577.jpg

适宜

Book 2008The book argues that the concept of self-defense in Islamic and International law is compatible. Al-Qaeda‘s declaration of Jihad does not meet the Islamic legal test. Similarly, the invasion of Iraq does meet the international legal test.

critique

Factual