Titlebook: Scientific Realism and International Relations; Jonathan Joseph (Reader in Politics and Internatio Book 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a divisio

性满足

Exploring Possible, Likely and Desirable Global Futures: Beyond the Closed vs Open Systems Dichotomfor comparable structural liabilities and tendencies that may yield in some ways analogical outcomes, albeit in a non-deterministic way. Moreover, what is needed is a causal analysis of the existing structures and ongoing processes, on which scenarios of possible futures can be built.

半圆凿

和平主义

Incise

COWER

State Theory in International Relations: Why Realism Matters,ed Halliday argued that the discipline does not have an adequate theory of the state (Halliday, 1987; Rosenberg, 1994). Some regard this as no great loss: international theory worth its name must concern itself with accounting for ‘third image’ phenomena, of which the balance of power and its occasi

小说

Inside the American State: Reconciling Structural and Interpretive Analyses within a Critical Realiderstanding of how the US decided to go to war against Iraq in 2003. In its approach to this question, however, the chapter also pursues a theoretical objective. Specifically, with increasing challenges to the once hegemonic political realism, it has become clear that states cannot be understood exc

裤子

取之不竭

Critical Realism and the Analysis of Democratisation: Does Philosophy of Science Matter?,ct across the social and political sciences during the last few decades (see e.g. Sayer, 2000; Danermark et al., 2001; Archer et al., 1998; Lawson, 1997; Patomaki, 2002; Wight, 2006a). Yet, critics have accused CR of being difficult to ‘apply’ in the concrete study of social and political affairs an

昏睡中

繁忙

Critical Realism, International Relations Theory and Marxism,st idealism, the latter having been the most powerful among them. Yet despite their apparent diversity, all these positions are based on a philosophical anti-realism and share parallel ontological commitments (Wight, 2006a, 2007; Joseph, 2000, 2004, 2006, 2007; Potamäki and Wight, 2000). A Marxist s