Titlebook: Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn; James Robert Brown Book 1984 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1984 Immanuel Kant.K

可扩大

书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn网络公开度




书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn被引频次




书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn被引频次学科排名




书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn年度引用




书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn年度引用学科排名




书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn读者反馈




书目名称Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn读者反馈学科排名

苍白

gastritis

978-90-481-8403-3Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1984

NEG

finite

1566-659X Overview: 978-90-481-8403-3978-94-015-7688-8Series ISSN 1566-659X Series E-ISSN 2215-1974

custody

On the Sociology of Belief, Knowledge, and Science,ch to adopt. Whether or not it is worthwhile to do so in a particular instance depends upon the existence of considerable disagreement over sufficiently interesting or controversial ideas. I find the issues at hand to be both interesting and controversial.

Decimate

混合物

Introduction: The Sociological Turn,mselves would have given to justify their theory choices? Perhaps we should be citing the “evidence” for the belief in question; perhaps we should be providing “good reasons” as part of the explanation for holding the belief. Which approach to understanding science is right?

偏见

The Pseudo-Science of Science?,elf. The older sociological tradition, which tended to take a hands-off policy where ‘sound’ scientific belief was concerned, has been variously indicted by the new wave as lacking the courage of its convictions, treating science as ‘sacred’ and unimaginatively selling short the explanatory resources of a robust sociology of knowledge.

分期付款

Two Historiographical Strategies: Ideas and Social Conditions in the History of Science,ould be largely a matter of relating scientific ideas to the social context in which they occur. Why is this? And what reasons do these “social historians” have for rejecting the older historiographical tradition?