Titlebook: Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn; James Robert Brown Book 1984 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1984 Immanuel Kant.K

钝剑

Problems of Intelligibility and Paradigm Instances,ogists and sociologists of knowledge for many years. It is clear from the principal papers, by Larry Laudan and David Bloor, that the encounter did not take on the characteristics of an ‘ideal speech situation’ wherein an ‘unconstrained consensus’ could be achieved. Nonetheless it marked something o

慢跑

The Rational and the Social in the History of Science,ms be shaped to some degree by social interests? And if these interests are themselves contingent features of the particular society, is there not an ineliminable contingency about even the most apparently secure scientific findings? How, then, can the rationality of science be said to transcend the

Hypopnea

A Plague on Both Your Houses,declared out of bounds by no less authorities than Scheler and Mannheim,. but the Edinburgh-based advocates of the Strong Programme are trying to run the blockade. All science is ideology, they say, not least the sociological science of science-as-ideology. Laudan put a shot across Edinburgh’s bows

啪心儿跳动

承认

The Role of Arational Factors in Interpretive History: The Case of Kant and ESP,context for doing research it would be of no interest to sociologists; if it professed no epistemology it would be of little interest to philosophers. Philosophers of science (in growing numbers, it seems) find a challenge in the tenets of the strong programme. That challenge has largely to do with

Finasteride

Mercantile

etiquette

痛打

不法行为