Titlebook: Romantic Literary Families; Scott Krawczyk Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2009 Percy Bysshe Shelley.Roman

injurious

书目名称Romantic Literary Families影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Romantic Literary Families影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Romantic Literary Families网络公开度




书目名称Romantic Literary Families网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Romantic Literary Families被引频次




书目名称Romantic Literary Families被引频次学科排名




书目名称Romantic Literary Families年度引用




书目名称Romantic Literary Families年度引用学科排名




书目名称Romantic Literary Families读者反馈




书目名称Romantic Literary Families读者反馈学科排名

断断续续

Endearing

Epilogue,potential of a household model of literary production. Furthermore, their report implicitly acknowledged that the literary family had emerged a major publishing force by the end of the eighteenth century.

群居男女

Book 2009ted by the Godwins and the Shelleys, this study traces the conflict and cooperation that developed within and among literary families as they sought to leave their legacies on the English world of letters.

euphoria

2691-1256 del presented by the Godwins and the Shelleys, this study traces the conflict and cooperation that developed within and among literary families as they sought to leave their legacies on the English world of letters.978-0-230-62338-5Series ISSN 2691-1256 Series E-ISSN 2634-5218

微生物

Essential

,“The A ikin School”: Adopting an Aesthetic,t. Needless to say, this led to more than one case of misattribution. An anecdote related by Samuel Rogers in his . (1856) tells of Charles James Fox (MP, 1768–1774) meeting John Aikin at a dinner party and offering praise for the collection:

Harass

Incorporating the Literary Family,ity of terms such as ., and . beyond strict blood relations. I rely on Tadmor’s formulation to demonstrate the suitability of this term to the business model of the literary family and to elucidate the means by which different literary families sought to “incorporate” themselves.

谁在削木头

Book 2009the century, displayed characteristics of a nascent corporation. This book examines different models of collaboration within English literary families during the period 1760-1820. Beginning with the sibling model of Anna Barbauld and John Aikin, and concluding with the intergenerational model presen

脱离

,Collaborative Dissent: Barbauld and Aikin’s Sibling Pamphlets, Paul’s Churchyard. Both were occasioned by recent applications to Parliament for the repeal of the Corporation and Test Acts, vestiges of Restoration policies that restricted the rights of Nonconformists, Protestant or Catholic, to practice their faith and to participate in the public sector. One,