Titlebook: Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation; Selected Essays by D David Zarefsky Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

flimsy

insert

Emmenagogue

Terrorism and the Argument from Ignoranceprecisely this argument that is used to argue that pre-emptive action should be taken against unknown but risky threats. Such an argument is a staple of discourse about terrorism, which typically involves stealth. In some cases, the argument from ignorance can be completely reasonable. This essay co

小官

Arguing About Values: The Problem of Public Moral Argumentrtainty. Partly for this reason, it is often difficult and uncomfortable to argue about moral values in a democratic public sphere. After exploring this tension, the essay identifies levels, strategies, and tactics for arguments about values, with illustrations of each. Although individuals may hold

碌碌之人

The Appeal for Transcendence: A Possible Response to Cases of Deep Disagreementrofound and go so deeply that the advocates find no basis for underlying agreement? In those cases there may be no dialectical or logical means to resolve the impasse. But rhetorical resolutions may be available if audiences can be convinced to perceive the argument in a new way. This essay identifi

我不明白

hemoglobin

Persistent Questions in the Theory of Argument Fieldsnes some of the key questions..Originally this essay was published in ., 18 (Spring, 1982), 191–203, where it introduced a special issue on argument fields. At the time of publication the journal was known as ..

恶心

脾气暴躁的人

DIS

Argument as Hypothesis-Testinging it are explored. The specific concern of the essay is with argumentation as deployed in competitive academic debate (referred to as “forensics”) but its point of view is generally applicable..This essay was originally published in an anthology, ., edited by David A. Thomas and published by National Textbook Company in 1979.