找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Revisiting Discovery and Justification; Historical and philo JUTTA SCHICKORE,FRIEDRICH STEINLE Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.

[复制链接]
查看: 28769|回复: 51
发表于 2025-3-21 17:26:43 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Revisiting Discovery and Justification
副标题Historical and philo
编辑JUTTA SCHICKORE,FRIEDRICH STEINLE
视频video
概述Historicises and contexualizes the ‘received view‘ of philosophy of science.Clears the grounds for the productive integration of history and philosophy of science.Caters to the recent interest in the
丛书名称Archimedes
图书封面Titlebook: Revisiting Discovery and Justification; Historical and philo JUTTA SCHICKORE,FRIEDRICH STEINLE Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.
描述.The distinction between the contexts of discovery and justification has had a turbulent career in philosophy of science. At times celebrated as the hallmark of philosophical approaches to science, at times condemned as ambiguous, distorting, and misleading, the distinction dominated philosophical debates from the early decades of the twentieth century to the 1980s. Until today, it informs our conception of the content, domain, and goals of philosophy of science. It is due to this fact that new trends in philosophy of experimentation and history and sociology of science have been marginalized by traditional scholarship in philosophy. To acknowledge properly this important recent work we need to re-open the debate about the nature, development, and significance of the context distinction, about its merits and flaws. The contributions to this volume provide close readings and detailed analyses of the original textual sources for the context distinction. They revise those accounts of ‘forerunners’ of the distinction that have been written through the lens of Logical Empiricism. They map, clarify, and analyse the derivations and mutations of the context distinctions as we encounter the
出版日期Book 2006
关键词experimentation; knowledge; philosophy of science; science; sociology
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4251-5
isbn_softcover978-90-481-7086-9
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-4251-5Series ISSN 1385-0180 Series E-ISSN 2215-0064
issn_series 1385-0180
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Revisiting Discovery and Justification影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Revisiting Discovery and Justification影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Revisiting Discovery and Justification网络公开度




书目名称Revisiting Discovery and Justification网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Revisiting Discovery and Justification被引频次




书目名称Revisiting Discovery and Justification被引频次学科排名




书目名称Revisiting Discovery and Justification年度引用




书目名称Revisiting Discovery and Justification年度引用学科排名




书目名称Revisiting Discovery and Justification读者反馈




书目名称Revisiting Discovery and Justification读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:31:20 | 显示全部楼层
FRIEDRICH STEINLEiers to trade between the member parties of the agreements. The process has accelerated with the failure of the multilateral Doha Round of negotiations to reach agreement. Since the pioneering effort by the NAFTA negotiations to include other issues in both the main FTA and corresponding side agreem
发表于 2025-3-22 02:37:40 | 显示全部楼层
THOMAS POTTHASTiers to trade between the member parties of the agreements. The process has accelerated with the failure of the multilateral Doha Round of negotiations to reach agreement. Since the pioneering effort by the NAFTA negotiations to include other issues in both the main FTA and corresponding side agreem
发表于 2025-3-22 07:57:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:50:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:54:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:04:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:37:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:24:11 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2006allmark of philosophical approaches to science, at times condemned as ambiguous, distorting, and misleading, the distinction dominated philosophical debates from the early decades of the twentieth century to the 1980s. Until today, it informs our conception of the content, domain, and goals of philo
发表于 2025-3-23 05:35:22 | 显示全部楼层
CONTEXT OF DISCOVERY VERSUS CONTEXT OF JUSTIFICATION AND THOMAS KUHNly Kuhn opposed the DJ distinction. This is noteworthy, because in the 1960s and 1970s, many philosophers concluded from Kuhn’s opposition to the context distinction that he just did not understand what it was all about (and they inferred from this that he was just too uneducated as a philosopher to be taken seriously).
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-26 15:30
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表