找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Retirement, Pensions and Justice; A Philosophical Anal Mark Hyde,Rory Shand Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017

[复制链接]
楼主: 颂歌
发表于 2025-3-23 13:01:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 14:23:16 | 显示全部楼层
Need and Just Pension Design,t financial assistance on the poor, but are blighted by low take-up and parsimonious benefit entitlements. While they appear to waste scarce resources, universal first pillar pensions maximise the flow and generosity of transfers to the least advantaged.
发表于 2025-3-23 19:19:18 | 显示全部楼层
Desert and Just Pension Design,several models for the design of the second pillar pension arrangement. Only defined benefit pensions have the capacity to ensure a consistent relationship between work and savings effort, and flows of retirement income.
发表于 2025-3-24 01:43:17 | 显示全部楼层
Citizenship and Just Pension Design,sources, such as those made possible by redistributive income transfers. Considered only in terms of citizenship, a just retirement system must address the reality of financial insecurity, as well as the possibility of coercion.
发表于 2025-3-24 04:13:45 | 显示全部楼层
liberal viewpoints within pension schemes.Looks at pension .This book addresses the tendency to mischaracterise liberalism as a “neoliberal” reform project, arguing that liberal political philosophy is concerned only to sustain the conditions that make individual freedom possible. This is illustrat
发表于 2025-3-24 09:40:31 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2017ed only to sustain the conditions that make individual freedom possible. This is illustrated with reference to the design of pensions. Considered in terms of liberal justice, retirement systems require redistributive transfers to help the poor, measures to ensure that retirees are rewarded on their
发表于 2025-3-24 13:17:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 16:00:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 21:13:42 | 显示全部楼层
Desert and Just Pension Design,To the limited extent that they endorse the desert principle, classical liberals insist that voluntary exchange is sufficient to ensure that market actors are appropriately remunerated for their contribution to production. Egalitarian liberals reject this assertion, insisting that the market is suff
发表于 2025-3-24 23:49:51 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-9 21:19
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表