书目名称 | Retirement, Pensions and Justice | 副标题 | A Philosophical Anal | 编辑 | Mark Hyde,Rory Shand | 视频video | | 概述 | Bridges finance and philosophy by examining retirement systems in terms of justice.Clarifies the differences between classic and egalitarian liberal viewpoints within pension schemes.Looks at pension | 图书封面 |  | 描述 | .This book addresses the tendency to mischaracterise liberalism as a “neoliberal” reform project, arguing that liberal political philosophy is concerned only to sustain the conditions that make individual freedom possible. This is illustrated with reference to the design of pensions. Considered in terms of liberal justice, retirement systems require redistributive transfers to help the poor, measures to ensure that retirees are rewarded on their merits, and provisions that treat everyone with equal dignity and respect. Rather than presenting liberal pensions as a close analogue to neoliberalism, this volume highlights their egalitarian virtues. This book will appeal to scholars of retirement and pensions, social policy, economics and political philosophy.. | 出版日期 | Book 2017 | 关键词 | Pension; Pension scheme; Retirement model; Pension Design; Justice; Social Policy; Social Solidarity; Liber | 版次 | 1 | doi | https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60066-0 | isbn_ebook | 978-1-137-60066-0 | copyright | The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 |
The information of publication is updating
书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice影响因子(影响力) 
书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice影响因子(影响力)学科排名 
书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice网络公开度 
书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice网络公开度学科排名 
书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice被引频次 
书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice被引频次学科排名 
书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice年度引用 
书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice年度引用学科排名 
书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice读者反馈 
书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice读者反馈学科排名 
|
|
|