找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Retirement, Pensions and Justice; A Philosophical Anal Mark Hyde,Rory Shand Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017

[复制链接]
查看: 30714|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 16:03:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice
副标题A Philosophical Anal
编辑Mark Hyde,Rory Shand
视频video
概述Bridges finance and philosophy by examining retirement systems in terms of justice.Clarifies the differences between classic and egalitarian liberal viewpoints within pension schemes.Looks at pension
图书封面Titlebook: Retirement, Pensions and Justice; A Philosophical Anal Mark Hyde,Rory Shand Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017
描述.This book addresses the tendency to mischaracterise liberalism as a “neoliberal” reform project, arguing that liberal political philosophy is concerned only to sustain the conditions that make individual freedom possible. This is illustrated with reference to the design of pensions. Considered in terms of liberal justice, retirement systems require redistributive transfers to help the poor, measures to ensure that retirees are rewarded on their merits, and provisions that treat everyone with equal dignity and respect. Rather than presenting liberal pensions as a close analogue to neoliberalism, this volume highlights their egalitarian virtues. This book will appeal to scholars of retirement and pensions, social policy, economics and political philosophy..
出版日期Book 2017
关键词Pension; Pension scheme; Retirement model; Pension Design; Justice; Social Policy; Social Solidarity; Liber
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60066-0
isbn_ebook978-1-137-60066-0
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice网络公开度




书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice被引频次




书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice被引频次学科排名




书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice年度引用




书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice年度引用学科排名




书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice读者反馈




书目名称Retirement, Pensions and Justice读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:29:26 | 显示全部楼层
Mark Hyde,Rory Shandlia and Malaysia these fundamental differences have to be addressed, and the implications of how these differences impact on refugee policy will be explored. In both cases the histories of ‘managing’ migrants and the cultural diversity of populations are open to interpretation, and are inherently po
发表于 2025-3-22 03:49:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:32:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:04:23 | 显示全部楼层
Mark Hyde,Rory Shandbest way to promote its Senator brand in poor rural areas of Uganda was to have local performance troupes sing about it to their neighbors, in local languages and musical styles. (Ugandans speak more than 30 languages, and identify as many distinct cultures within their national boundaries.) The str
发表于 2025-3-22 13:11:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:16:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:07:17 | 显示全部楼层
senting liberal pensions as a close analogue to neoliberalism, this volume highlights their egalitarian virtues. This book will appeal to scholars of retirement and pensions, social policy, economics and political philosophy..978-1-137-60066-0
发表于 2025-3-23 03:28:01 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion,liberties of all citizens. Alongside these virtues, we note that the critics of liberalism invariably endorse perspectives that are deeply flawed. Social policy analysis characteristically demonstrates an unacceptable degree of paternalism, premised on an unjustifiable faith in the capacity of government to act in the best interests of citizens.
发表于 2025-3-23 05:57:48 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-23 23:03
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表