找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Rethinking the Normative Content of Critical Theory; Marx, Habermas and B Bob Cannon Book 2001 Bob Cannon 2001 capitalism.critical theory.J

[复制链接]
楼主: Enclosure
发表于 2025-3-26 21:11:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 01:26:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 06:34:35 | 显示全部楼层
From Self-Constitution to Self-Objectificationity from the outset. An early and seminal formulation of this opposition can be found in René Descartes’ differentiation of . (thinking substance) from . (extended substance). Having thus divided the world into ‘immaterial thoughts’ and ‘unthinking matter’ Descartes is concerned to account for how t
发表于 2025-3-27 11:34:12 | 显示全部楼层
The Capitalization of Labour and the Sociality of Exchangelationship between things (commodities). In section (i) I argue that labour does possess a social identity in production — the social identity of capital. I make this claim on the basis of Marx’s own account of the ‘real subsumption of labour’ beneath capital. It follows that labour cannot be the so
发表于 2025-3-27 16:30:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 19:24:20 | 显示全部楼层
Communicative Action This has led some to proclaim the ‘death of the subject’ in favour of a trans-subjective alternative, such as Michel Foucault’s notion of discourse (Foucault 1976). However, others, such as Jürgen Habermas, have sought to preserve the modern ethos of autonomy by providing it with an intersubjective
发表于 2025-3-28 00:10:03 | 显示全部楼层
Labour and Moralityying subjectivity. Unfortunately, the move from a subject-centred to an intersubjective account of self-constitution leaves labour behind. This, however, creates a tension in Habermas’s account of modernity between the democratic principles of ‘discourse ethics’ and the ‘non-normative’ structures th
发表于 2025-3-28 03:44:41 | 显示全部楼层
Struggles for Moral Redemptionbjectivity to labour. Honneth thus rejects Habermas’s abandonment of labour to the ‘non-normative’ system in favour of reformulating workers’ struggles in normative terms. Nevertheless, Honneth’s alternative to Habermas’ communicative paradigm is restricted to the latter’s culturally bound account o
发表于 2025-3-28 09:56:01 | 显示全部楼层
Struggles for Social Welfaremas’s consensus-driven model of communicative action. Nevertheless, by restricting morality to the ‘cultural’ sphere Honneth endorses Habermas’s uncoupling of the economy from the normative content of modernity. Thus, while Honneth is to be congratulated for replacing Marx’s subject-centred account
发表于 2025-3-28 14:14:30 | 显示全部楼层
Concluding Remarksplicit in the social conditions they seek to criticize this cannot be avoided. All attempts to anchor the normative content of modernity in a ‘philosophical anthropology’, whether labour, ‘communicative action’ or mutual recognition, controverts the ethos of autonomy that grounds the normative conte
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-10 02:27
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表