找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Rethinking the Normative Content of Critical Theory; Marx, Habermas and B Bob Cannon Book 2001 Bob Cannon 2001 capitalism.critical theory.J

[复制链接]
楼主: Enclosure
发表于 2025-3-25 04:41:44 | 显示全部楼层
Marx’s Critique of Political Economy versus his Critique of CapitalismIn an article on Max Horkheimer entitled ‘Critical Theory and Political Economy’, Moishe Postone and Barbara Brick argue that:
发表于 2025-3-25 08:08:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 15:31:54 | 显示全部楼层
Marx, Morality and Exploitationnshistorical) standpoint of production, workers are paid less than the value they produce for capital. Consequently, while capitalism appears just from the standpoint of exchange, it appears unjust from the standpoint of production.
发表于 2025-3-25 18:09:46 | 显示全部楼层
Communicative Action foundation. In this chapter I trace the origins of Habermas’s attempt to provide critical theory with a normative ground from Marx through Georg Lukâcs to Habermas’s Frankfurt School predecessors. In particular, I want to emphasize the importance of Max Weber’s account of ‘instrumental reason’ on this trajectory and the errors it has led to.
发表于 2025-3-25 20:46:13 | 显示全部楼层
Struggles for Social Welfareof labour with an intersubjective account, he fails to acknowledge sufficiently the ‘moral’ content of workers’ ‘material’ struggles. To rectify this I propose to view workers’ struggles as attempts to retrieve the intersubjective domain lost beneath the system’s diremption of ‘ethical life’.
发表于 2025-3-26 01:21:42 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2001historical categories that are vulnerable to his own critique of political economy. Jurgen Habermas and Axel Honneth seek to correct this by placing critical theory on a normative foundation. Unfortunately, they restrict this to the cultural sphere. By extending their notion of intersubjectivity to
发表于 2025-3-26 06:17:28 | 显示全部楼层
Struggles for Moral Redemptionby grounding his own version of ‘undamaged intersubjectivity’ in an underlying ‘philosophical anthropology’. To this extent, Honneth, like Marx and Habermas before him, grounds critical theory, not in the struggles of participants to redeem the normative promise of modernity, but in a social ontology that the latter is tasked to realize.
发表于 2025-3-26 08:53:56 | 显示全部楼层
Concluding Remarksess a means to judge the ‘pathologies’ of modernity than a manifestation of them. No matter how benign the motives behind this undertaking, it comprises an attempt to criticize modernity from a standpoint incompatible with its normative content.
发表于 2025-3-26 12:46:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 17:27:42 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2001ritical theory on a normative foundation. Unfortunately, they restrict this to the cultural sphere. By extending their notion of intersubjectivity to the economic system it can be viewed as an inactive form of morality which social movements influence in the course of their struggles.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-10 04:05
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表