找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Rethinking Freedom; Why Freedom Has Lost C. Fred Alford Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2005 freedom.interv

[复制链接]
查看: 9071|回复: 37
发表于 2025-3-21 17:10:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Rethinking Freedom
副标题Why Freedom Has Lost
编辑C. Fred Alford
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Rethinking Freedom; Why Freedom Has Lost C. Fred Alford Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2005 freedom.interv
描述This book examines the use and abuse of the term ‘freedom‘. Based on interviews with people concerning the nature of freedom, the author compares what the people he talked with said about freedom with what writers and thinkers such as Jean-Paul Sartre, Herbert Marcuse, and Iris Murdoch have to say about freedom. He concludes that the ‘political‘ is not the answer, and that most of the people interviewed for the book and those like them would be better served by learning the political and social skills necessary to carve out small spaces of freedom in a rationalized world.
出版日期Book 2005
关键词freedom; interview; learning; liberty; nature
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781403978783
isbn_softcover978-1-4039-6872-2
isbn_ebook978-1-4039-7878-3
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2005
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Rethinking Freedom影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Rethinking Freedom影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Rethinking Freedom网络公开度




书目名称Rethinking Freedom网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Rethinking Freedom被引频次




书目名称Rethinking Freedom被引频次学科排名




书目名称Rethinking Freedom年度引用




书目名称Rethinking Freedom年度引用学科排名




书目名称Rethinking Freedom读者反馈




书目名称Rethinking Freedom读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:45:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:52:49 | 显示全部楼层
Bad Faith?,t just a political slogan but also a personal project. One might imagine that given their individualistic understanding of freedom, young people would be taken with Sartre. Unfortunately, Sartre now belongs to the ages, or at least to another age. Few young people could say much about his philosophy.
发表于 2025-3-22 07:49:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:22:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:59:06 | 显示全部楼层
978-1-4039-6872-2Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2005
发表于 2025-3-22 20:16:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:08:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:10:01 | 显示全部楼层
C. Fred Alfordcas (FTAA) – ‘global civil society’ has become a popular concept among academic, activist, and government circles, and among citizens in many countries.. The ‘revival’ of civil society was first associated with Poland’s . movement. It extended to other East European and Latin American groups which w
发表于 2025-3-23 07:18:25 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-11 20:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表