Titlebook: Responsibility and Punishment; J. Angelo Corlett Book 20042nd edition Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2004 Crime.Immanuel Kant.compen

Hallowed

Assessing Retributivism,, such as the one regarding proportional punishment, are similar between Kant’s retributivism and the new version of it, the replies to these concerns in this chapter will focus on the notions of proportional punishment and desert, and will, I trust, enable us to make better sense of the nature of r

Acupressure

Forgiveness, Mercy, and Retributivism,st that the state has a duty to punish. For retributivism itself does not entail such a view, though some versions of retributivism (e.g., Immanuel Kant’s) espouse the claim that punishment is the perfect duty of the state. But as Jeffrie G. Murphy argues, all that needs to be shown by the retributi

patriot

聋子

Corprate Responsibility and Punishment,rs, the ruination of the Amazon rainforest by global corporate, political and other interests, or whether it is the Exxon oil spill in Prince William Sound, Alaska which permanently and adversely effected that environment as well as the economic viability of local companies (and workers) the success

事先无准备

figurine

Conclusion,as set forth, one that was grounded in and based on some of the basic concepts of contemporary moral responsibility theory, and one which can be used in criminal justice contexts and is congruent with the basic elements of criminal responsibility under U.S. law. The analysis provides philosophical s

偶像

Book 20042nd editionn of retributivism emerges as one which withstands more criticism than competing theories of responsibility and punishment. Extending the problem of wrong doing to collectives and compensation, Corlett explores the matter of reparations for past wrongs in the case of the crimes committed against Nat

Credence

毗邻

J. Angelo CorlettPresents a lucid defense of retributivism against several long-standing criticisms.Extends discussion of wrong-doing to collectives and compensation through discussion of US treatment of Native Americ

删减

Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2004