Titlebook: Resource-Sensitivity, Binding and Anaphora; Geert-Jan M. Kruijff,Richard T. Oehrle Book 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003 communication

鸵鸟

Demulcent

0924-4662 ategorial framework offers a natural setting in which to study questions of grammatical composition, both empirically and abstractly. There are affinities in this perspective, of course, to basic questions in formal language theory. But the fact that categorial grammars are type in­ ference systems

谷物

Glower

装饰

cognizant

Binding without Pronouns (and Pronouns without Binding)eneral set of syntactic/semantic operations—although the question at issue here is just how small.) Of crucial importance is the claim that each syntactic expression is directly assigned a model-theoretic interpretation, and hence no expression needs to be mapped into some other level such as LF in order to be interpreted.

Intractable

Germinate

事物的方面

Binding without Pronouns (and Pronouns without Binding)ics work in tandem in such a way that the syntactic combinatory operations specify a set of well-formed expressions and each such operation is coupled with a semantic operation which provides a model-theoretic interpretation for the expression. I also assume a general Categorial Grammar (CG) impleme

Intellectual

Binding across Boundariesre are various ways in which this reference to a larger context can manifest itself: For example, information structure, contextual reference, or entailments arising from aspectual structure. How (and whether) we can embed the meaning into the larger context then influences the coherence and actual