Titlebook: Resolving Disagreements; A Semantic and Epist Åke Wahlberg Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen

不能妥协

BARGE

Dna262

Disagreement and Belief I: Puzzles About Disagreement,traightforward semantic explanation of what exactly a disagreement is in terms of propositional contents, the following question remains: what is the relationship between rational agents believing those contents and those contents themselves? The chapter examines this by reviewing familiar puzzles of belief attribution.

泛滥

Interpretation, Meaning, and Disagreement,e on what they take to be true and seek to explicate divergences from this. Due to this, disagreements are as much a disturbance of communication and intersubjective intelligibility as they are disruptive for any agent striving to entertain true beliefs.

飞行员

值得尊敬

Introduction, the epistemological discourse to those semantic issues. By doing this, it seeks to demonstrate that the interpersonal assessment and specification of a disagreement entail epistemic elements bearing on the rational implications of peer disagreement, and on the possibilities of resolving disagreement.

Nibble

FRET

Disagreement in Religion,equence of the Davidsonian insights is that the specification of religious disagreement requires shared epistemic criteria. At the same time, however, those shared criteria enabling the specification of disagreement are also what makes its resolution possible.

一回合

Introduction,hin philosophy, there are two broad branches of research where the generic phenomenon of disagreement is being studied: epistemology and philosophy of language. The branch of epistemology asks: what is the rationally correct response to a disagreement with peers? The branch of philosophy of language

deface

The Epistemological Relevance of Disagreement,nconciliatory positions and describes what the epistemological significance of interpersonal disagreement is in the first place. By discussing Robert Audi’s highly fine-grained taxonomy of “cognitive disparities,” the chapter ends by anticipating the main themes of Chaps. ., . and .: how the communi