找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field; Marlies Glasius,Meta de Lange,Kris Ruijgrok Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018 The Editor(s) (if appl

[复制链接]
查看: 38794|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 19:34:46 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field
编辑Marlies Glasius,Meta de Lange,Kris Ruijgrok
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/829/828074/828074.mp4
概述Builds on the authors‘ extensive and recent first-hand experiences in authoritarian areas.Treats the challenges of the authoritarian field comprehensively and cross-regionally in the first Open Access
图书封面Titlebook: Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field;  Marlies Glasius,Meta de Lange,Kris Ruijgrok Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018 The Editor(s) (if appl
描述.This open access book offers a synthetic reflection on the authors’ fieldwork experiences in seven countries within the framework of ‘Authoritarianism in a Global Age’, a major comparative research project. It responds to the demand for increased attention to methodological rigor and transparency in qualitative research, and seeks to advance and practically support field research in authoritarian contexts. Without reducing the conundrums of authoritarian field research to a simple how-to guide, the book systematically reflects and reports on the authors’ combined experiences in (i) getting access to the field, (ii) assessing risk, (iii) navigating ‘red lines’, (iv) building relations with local collaborators and respondents, (v) handling the psychological pressures on field researchers, and (vi) balancing transparency and prudence in publishing research. It offers unique insights into this particularly challenging area of field research, makes explicit how the authors handled methodological challenges and ethical dilemmas, and offers recommendations where appropriate. .
出版日期Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018
关键词Open Access; research ethics; authoritarian countries; research methodology; research in the authoritari
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68966-1
isbn_softcover978-3-319-88692-3
isbn_ebook978-3-319-68966-1
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field网络公开度




书目名称Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field被引频次




书目名称Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field被引频次学科排名




书目名称Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field年度引用




书目名称Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field年度引用学科排名




书目名称Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field读者反馈




书目名称Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:38:21 | 显示全部楼层
Entering the Field,have faced, and what we can do to assess and mitigate those risks. We conclude that while we should be aware of risk and try to minimize it, we need to accept that risk cannot be eliminated if we want to engage in authoritarian fieldwork.
发表于 2025-3-22 01:36:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:51:49 | 显示全部楼层
Building and Maintaining Relations in the Field,characteristics, presenting a version of ourselves that helps us get information. We reflect on having been subject to manipulation by local contacts and respondents. Finally, we consider the debt we owe collaborators and respondents in the field, and the limited ways in which we can do something in return.
发表于 2025-3-22 12:44:38 | 显示全部楼层
Mental Impact, results, and a sense of shame and career worries associated with not getting them, can compound negative impact of fieldwork. Finally though, we also record the positive effects of fieldwork on our psyche and worldview. We conclude with the importance of making it possible to talk about mental impact, before, during, and after fieldwork.
发表于 2025-3-22 16:15:53 | 显示全部楼层
Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018m in a Global Age’, a major comparative research project. It responds to the demand for increased attention to methodological rigor and transparency in qualitative research, and seeks to advance and practically support field research in authoritarian contexts. Without reducing the conundrums of auth
发表于 2025-3-22 20:27:57 | 显示全部楼层
Writing It Up,our methods of working. The second is to promote a culture of controlled sharing of anonymized sources. Finally, we reflect on trade-offs between publicly criticizing authoritarian regimes and future access to the authoritarian field.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:10:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:43:56 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,ook useful. By recording our joint experiences in very different authoritarian contexts systematically and succinctly, comparing and contrasting them, and drawing lessons, we aim to give other researchers a framework, so they will not need to start from scratch as we did. It is not the absence of fr
发表于 2025-3-23 06:46:08 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-12 18:44
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表