找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Reproductive Ethics II; New Ideas and Innova Lisa Campo-Engelstein,Paul Burcher Conference proceedings 2018 Springer International Publishi

[复制链接]
楼主: ergonomics
发表于 2025-3-23 10:18:53 | 显示全部楼层
Creating a Higher Breed: Transhumanism and the Prophecy of Anglo-American Eugenicsvigorous enhancement (i.e., transhumanists) routinely emphasize that enhancement decisions would stem from individuals and families, not the state. In a multipronged critique, I show the untenability of transhumanists’ denials.
发表于 2025-3-23 16:53:21 | 显示全部楼层
Reproductive Ethics: Introduction,ember that the explosion of reproductive ethics is as much from new thinking as it is from new technologies, and, at least in regard to reproductive possibilities for the LGBTQ community, it may well be fair to say that it is our new thinking that then led to new technological explorations.
发表于 2025-3-23 19:02:31 | 显示全部楼层
Reproductive Ethics: Introduction,s and religious strictures than by any serious philosophical or empirical inquiry. However, more recently reproductive ethics has exploded as a field for several reasons. At a cultural level, many things taken for granted a generation ago, including the increasing medicalization of birth and the het
发表于 2025-3-24 01:11:59 | 显示全部楼层
and the Question of Children’s Rights , Human Germline Genetic Modification science fiction, like the artificially made Creature imagined in Mary Shelley’s 1818 novel .. After surveying the history of making genetically modified (GM) children through three-person IVF since the late 1990s, I sketch a framework for a normative political theory of the rights of the GM childre
发表于 2025-3-24 05:37:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 09:55:15 | 显示全部楼层
Creating a Higher Breed: Transhumanism and the Prophecy of Anglo-American Eugenicsusibility of supporters’ rejecting all substantive ties between their views and earlier eugenics. When denying such connections, today’s advocates of vigorous enhancement (i.e., transhumanists) routinely emphasize that enhancement decisions would stem from individuals and families, not the state. In
发表于 2025-3-24 11:16:21 | 显示全部楼层
One Is the Loneliest Number: How the WHO’s Redefinition of Infertility Provokes Contestations of thend disabled – and thus as eligible to receive publically funded artificial reproductive therapies – single women and men who are unable to have children solely because of their inability to find a sexual partner. The purpose of this paper is to critically examine two other lesser-discussed but nonet
发表于 2025-3-24 16:28:26 | 显示全部楼层
Expanding the Clinical Definition of Infertility to Include Socially Infertile Individuals and Couplheir relationship status. Due to the high cost of infertility treatments and inadequate insurance coverage, the socially infertile has minimal access to assisted reproductive technology (ART). Under the current medical definitions of infertility, even in states with infertility insurance mandates, o
发表于 2025-3-24 22:00:37 | 显示全部楼层
Social Responses to the Environmental Impact of Reproduction in the Global West: A Critique of Chrisal West ought to reproduce at a replacement rate in light of environmental concerns. Overall’s recommendation does not adequately account for the sociopolitical context in which human beings have children. The ecofeminist response is one which recommends increased access to education, and sexual edu
发表于 2025-3-24 23:18:05 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-23 14:22
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表