找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Redefining Geometrical Exactness; Descartes’ Transform Henk J. M. Bos Book 2001 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2001 Canon.Discard.Mathemati

[复制链接]
楼主: papyrus
发表于 2025-3-26 22:32:18 | 显示全部楼层
2196-8810 geometry. Yet the key question of the book was foundational rather than technical: When are geometrical objects known with such clarity and distinctness as befits the exact science of geometry? Classically, the answer was sought in procedures of geometrical construction, in particular by ruler and c
发表于 2025-3-27 04:37:49 | 显示全部楼层
The legitimation of geometrical procedures before 1590e classical ideas on the legitimacy of constructions here; rather I can restrict myself to dealing with those few classical sources that actually influenced the early modern debates. Besides, and fortunately, I can refer to an excellent recent study on the classical tradition of geometrical problem solving, Wilbur Knorr’s ...
发表于 2025-3-27 06:19:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 12:29:37 | 显示全部楼层
Arithmetic, geometry, algebra, and analysissubject of Chapter 7. We find the first successful merging of the fields of algebra, arithmetic, and geometry in the work of Viète; Chapter 8 explains how Viète overcame the obstacles and the legitimation issues involved.
发表于 2025-3-27 16:42:32 | 显示全部楼层
Geometrical problem solving — the state of the art c. 1635therefore appropriate to conclude Part I by a sketch of the state of the art of geometrical problem solving around 1635, that is, just before Descartes published his innovations (and also before Fermat’s new techniques began to circulate among cognoscenti).
发表于 2025-3-27 20:37:43 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction to Part IIe early modern period Descartes was the key figure with respect to these issues. His . of 1637 was to be the dominating influence in mathematics for more than 50 years. It was, as I will show, largely motivated by the need, as perceived by its author, for a more precise and reasoned definition of exactness in geometry.
发表于 2025-3-27 22:43:47 | 显示全部楼层
Construction and the interpretation of exactness in Descartes’ studies of c. 1619se the text has ad value because Descartes formulated his program entirely in terms of a classification of mathematical problems with respect to their solution by calculation or construction. Thus the letter to Beeckman provides a natural starting point of my inquiry into the development of Descartes’ ideas about construction.
发表于 2025-3-28 02:27:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 07:14:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 13:10:24 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0087-8Canon; Discard; Mathematica; analytic geometry; arithmetic; construction; development; equation; field; form;
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-11 09:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表