Titlebook: Reappraising European IR Theoretical Traditions; Knud Erik Jørgensen,Audrey Alejandro,Helen Turton Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

ineptitude

Book 2017ace within scientific disciplines. Scholars therefore routinely talk/debate about the discipline of IR and its theories, theories are often used to form the pedagogical backbone of IR and theories are also a key part of scholarly identities. Over time, theories crystalize in to schools of thought, s

慌张

Europe,and perspectives, others are perceived in their own right emphatically and open-mindedly. In addition, encounters with them can evolve peacefully and they can lead to the creation of knowledge that might have been unattainable in a solitary action.

prostate-gland

重画只能放弃

Reflexivity, conditions of academic productions contributes to a better awareness of the biases preventing diversity. To address counterproductive narratives such as Eurocentrism, a new reflexive rationale is developed around a reappraisal of the concept of ethnocentrism.

Biguanides

清澈

Hegemony,be hegemonic, this chapter makes the claim that the USA dominates the discipline of IR institutionally but not intellectually. In challenging the assumption that the USA is hegemonic in intellectual terms, the chapter calls for a rereading of European IR and for European IR to be repositioned in disciplinary narratives.

能量守恒

Introduction,ntify the building blocks of scientific disciplines. Finally, they explicate the value of reconstructing theoretical traditions and argue that intellectual hegemony is a chimera and thus more imagined than real.

stratum-corneum

Diversity,cademic “dialogue” implies the encountering of two distinct perspectives, in their quest for academic otherness, European scholars may have forgotten to construct their own part of the dialogical formula. The chapter illustrates how scholars around the world—and in particular in Brazil, India and China—have already done so.

简洁

FILTH

Reconstruction,eproduce and transform it in specific political, historical and intellectual contexts, to make visible, to define and to strengthen the identity of the European IR community; and thereby identifying the European flavours of each tradition.